Operator comparison
Aligned Data Centers vs Ascenty (Digital Realty)
Both columns come from the facilities each operator publishes and Coloprice tracks: Aligned Data Centers — 40 facilities in 5 countries, Ascenty (Digital Realty) — 36 facilities in 4 countries. Score is the independent Coloprice Score of each facility, averaged; it is never sold.
Aligned Data Centers
40
Tracked facilities · Länder: 5
Betriebsländer: Brasilien, Chile, Kolumbien, Mexiko, USA
Ascenty (Digital Realty)
36
Tracked facilities · Länder: 4
Betriebsländer: Brasilien, Chile, Kolumbien, Mexiko
Portfolios side by side
| Field | Aligned Data Centers | Ascenty (Digital Realty) |
|---|---|---|
| Tracked facilities | 40 | 36 |
| Länder | 5 | 4 |
| Städte | 31 | 12 |
| Veröffentlichte IT-Kapazität | 2,935 MW (16 von 40 Rechenzentren veröffentlichen) | 618 MW (36 von 36 Rechenzentren veröffentlichen) |
| In Betrieb | 34 | 31 |
| Im Bau / angekündigt | 6 | 5 |
| Flüssigkeitsgekühlte Rechenzentren | 25 | 1 |
| KI-fähige Rechenzentren | 26 | 1 |
| Häufigste Zertifizierungen | ISO 27001, PCI DSS, SOC 2 Type 2, HIPAA | ISO 27001, PCI-DSS, SOC 1 Type II, SOC 2 Type II |
| Durchschnittlicher Coloprice Score | 32/100 über 40 bewertete Rechenzentren | 35/100 über 36 bewertete Rechenzentren |
| Auszeichnungen und Abzeichen | 31 | 35 |
| Bestbewertetes Rechenzentrum | Aligned SLC-03 (West Jordan) (52/100) | Ascenty São Paulo 5 (57/100) |
Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-09-26; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.
Where they differ
Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.
- Tracked facilities: Aligned Data Centers — 40; Ascenty (Digital Realty) — 36
- Länder: Aligned Data Centers — 5; Ascenty (Digital Realty) — 4
- Städte: Aligned Data Centers — 31; Ascenty (Digital Realty) — 12
- Veröffentlichte IT-Kapazität: Aligned Data Centers — 2,935 MW (16 von 40 Rechenzentren veröffentlichen); Ascenty (Digital Realty) — 618 MW (36 von 36 Rechenzentren veröffentlichen)
- In Betrieb: Aligned Data Centers — 34; Ascenty (Digital Realty) — 31
- Im Bau / angekündigt: Aligned Data Centers — 6; Ascenty (Digital Realty) — 5
- Flüssigkeitsgekühlte Rechenzentren: Aligned Data Centers — 25; Ascenty (Digital Realty) — 1
- KI-fähige Rechenzentren: Aligned Data Centers — 26; Ascenty (Digital Realty) — 1
- Häufigste Zertifizierungen: Aligned Data Centers — ISO 27001, PCI DSS, SOC 2 Type 2, HIPAA; Ascenty (Digital Realty) — ISO 27001, PCI-DSS, SOC 1 Type II, SOC 2 Type II
- Durchschnittlicher Coloprice Score: Aligned Data Centers — 32/100 über 40 bewertete Rechenzentren; Ascenty (Digital Realty) — 35/100 über 36 bewertete Rechenzentren
- Auszeichnungen und Abzeichen: Aligned Data Centers — 31; Ascenty (Digital Realty) — 35
- Bestbewertetes Rechenzentrum: Aligned Data Centers — Aligned SLC-03 (West Jordan) (52/100); Ascenty (Digital Realty) — Ascenty São Paulo 5 (57/100)
Bestbewertetes Rechenzentrum
Aligned Data Centers
Aligned SLC-03 (West Jordan)
West Jordan, USA · 100 MW · 52/100
Ascenty (Digital Realty)
Ascenty São Paulo 5
Osasco, Brasilien · 8 MW · 57/100
Profil von Aligned Data Centers öffnen →Profil von Ascenty (Digital Realty) öffnen →
Other comparisons
Aligned Data Centers vs Tecto Data CentersAligned Data Centers vs KIO NetworksAligned Data Centers vs Scala Data CentersAscenty (Digital Realty) vs Scala Data CentersAscenty (Digital Realty) vs Elea Data CentersAscenty (Digital Realty) vs EquinixAscenty (Digital Realty) vs GTDAscenty (Digital Realty) vs KIO Networks