Operator comparison
Converge ICT Solutions Inc. vs ePLDT (VITRO Inc.)
Both columns come from the facilities each operator publishes and Coloprice tracks: Converge ICT Solutions Inc. — 3 facilities in 1 countries, ePLDT (VITRO Inc.) — 6 facilities in 1 countries. Score is the independent Coloprice Score of each facility, averaged; it is never sold.
Converge ICT Solutions Inc.
3
Tracked facilities · Länder: 1
Betriebsländer: Philippinen
ePLDT (VITRO Inc.)
6
Tracked facilities · Länder: 1
Betriebsländer: Philippinen
Portfolios side by side
| Field | Converge ICT Solutions Inc. | ePLDT (VITRO Inc.) |
|---|---|---|
| Tracked facilities | 3 | 6 |
| Länder | 1 | 1 |
| Städte | 2 | 4 |
| Veröffentlichte IT-Kapazität | 12 MW (1 von 3 Rechenzentren veröffentlichen) | 117 MW (4 von 6 Rechenzentren veröffentlichen) |
| In Betrieb | 3 | 6 |
| Im Bau / angekündigt | 0 | 0 |
| Flüssigkeitsgekühlte Rechenzentren | 0 | 0 |
| KI-fähige Rechenzentren | 1 | 2 |
| Häufigste Zertifizierungen | Uptime Institute Tier III Certification of Constructed Facility, Uptime Institute Tier III Certification of Design Documents | ANSI/TIA-942 Rated 3 Facilities Certification, ANSI/TIA-942-B Constructed Facility, TIA-942 Rated 3 |
| Durchschnittlicher Coloprice Score | 21/100 über 3 bewertete Rechenzentren | 32/100 über 6 bewertete Rechenzentren |
| Auszeichnungen und Abzeichen | 2 | 9 |
| Bestbewertetes Rechenzentrum | Converge ICT Angeles Data Center (50/100) | VITRO Santa Rosa (60/100) |
Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-09-26; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.
Where they differ
Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.
- Tracked facilities: Converge ICT Solutions Inc. — 3; ePLDT (VITRO Inc.) — 6
- Städte: Converge ICT Solutions Inc. — 2; ePLDT (VITRO Inc.) — 4
- Veröffentlichte IT-Kapazität: Converge ICT Solutions Inc. — 12 MW (1 von 3 Rechenzentren veröffentlichen); ePLDT (VITRO Inc.) — 117 MW (4 von 6 Rechenzentren veröffentlichen)
- In Betrieb: Converge ICT Solutions Inc. — 3; ePLDT (VITRO Inc.) — 6
- KI-fähige Rechenzentren: Converge ICT Solutions Inc. — 1; ePLDT (VITRO Inc.) — 2
- Häufigste Zertifizierungen: Converge ICT Solutions Inc. — Uptime Institute Tier III Certification of Constructed Facility, Uptime Institute Tier III Certification of Design Documents; ePLDT (VITRO Inc.) — ANSI/TIA-942 Rated 3 Facilities Certification, ANSI/TIA-942-B Constructed Facility, TIA-942 Rated 3
- Durchschnittlicher Coloprice Score: Converge ICT Solutions Inc. — 21/100 über 3 bewertete Rechenzentren; ePLDT (VITRO Inc.) — 32/100 über 6 bewertete Rechenzentren
- Auszeichnungen und Abzeichen: Converge ICT Solutions Inc. — 2; ePLDT (VITRO Inc.) — 9
- Bestbewertetes Rechenzentrum: Converge ICT Solutions Inc. — Converge ICT Angeles Data Center (50/100); ePLDT (VITRO Inc.) — VITRO Santa Rosa (60/100)
Bestbewertetes Rechenzentrum
Converge ICT Solutions Inc.
Converge ICT Angeles Data Center
Angeles City, Pampanga, Philippinen · 12 MW · 50/100
ePLDT (VITRO Inc.)
VITRO Santa Rosa
Santa Rosa, Laguna, Philippinen · 100 MW · 60/100
Profil von Converge ICT Solutions Inc. öffnen →Profil von ePLDT (VITRO Inc.) öffnen →
Other comparisons
Converge ICT Solutions Inc. vs STT GDC PhilippinesConverge ICT Solutions Inc. vs Globe Telecom (GTI Corporation)STT GDC Philippines vs ePLDT (VITRO Inc.)Globe Telecom (GTI Corporation) vs ePLDT (VITRO Inc.)