Operator comparison
Converge ICT Solutions Inc. vs ePLDT (VITRO Inc.)
Both columns come from the facilities each operator publishes and Coloprice tracks: Converge ICT Solutions Inc. — 3 facilities in 1 countries, ePLDT (VITRO Inc.) — 6 facilities in 1 countries. Score is the independent Coloprice Score of each facility, averaged; it is never sold.
Converge ICT Solutions Inc.
3
Tracked facilities · Countries: 1
Where they operate: Philippines
ePLDT (VITRO Inc.)
6
Tracked facilities · Countries: 1
Where they operate: Philippines
Portfolios side by side
| Field | Converge ICT Solutions Inc. | ePLDT (VITRO Inc.) |
|---|---|---|
| Tracked facilities | 3 | 6 |
| Countries | 1 | 1 |
| Cities | 2 | 4 |
| Published IT capacity | 12 MW (1 of 3 sites publish) | 117 MW (4 of 6 sites publish) |
| Operational | 3 | 6 |
| Under construction / announced | 0 | 0 |
| Liquid-cooled sites | 0 | 0 |
| AI-ready sites | 1 | 2 |
| Most common certifications | Uptime Institute Tier III Certification of Constructed Facility, Uptime Institute Tier III Certification of Design Documents | ANSI/TIA-942 Rated 3 Facilities Certification, ANSI/TIA-942-B Constructed Facility, TIA-942 Rated 3 |
| Average Coloprice Score | 21/100 across 3 scored sites | 32/100 across 6 scored sites |
| Awards and badges | 2 | 9 |
| Highest-scored facility | Converge ICT Angeles Data Center (50/100) | VITRO Santa Rosa (60/100) |
Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-09-26; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.
Where they differ
Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.
- Tracked facilities: Converge ICT Solutions Inc. — 3; ePLDT (VITRO Inc.) — 6
- Cities: Converge ICT Solutions Inc. — 2; ePLDT (VITRO Inc.) — 4
- Published IT capacity: Converge ICT Solutions Inc. — 12 MW (1 of 3 sites publish); ePLDT (VITRO Inc.) — 117 MW (4 of 6 sites publish)
- Operational: Converge ICT Solutions Inc. — 3; ePLDT (VITRO Inc.) — 6
- AI-ready sites: Converge ICT Solutions Inc. — 1; ePLDT (VITRO Inc.) — 2
- Most common certifications: Converge ICT Solutions Inc. — Uptime Institute Tier III Certification of Constructed Facility, Uptime Institute Tier III Certification of Design Documents; ePLDT (VITRO Inc.) — ANSI/TIA-942 Rated 3 Facilities Certification, ANSI/TIA-942-B Constructed Facility, TIA-942 Rated 3
- Average Coloprice Score: Converge ICT Solutions Inc. — 21/100 across 3 scored sites; ePLDT (VITRO Inc.) — 32/100 across 6 scored sites
- Awards and badges: Converge ICT Solutions Inc. — 2; ePLDT (VITRO Inc.) — 9
- Highest-scored facility: Converge ICT Solutions Inc. — Converge ICT Angeles Data Center (50/100); ePLDT (VITRO Inc.) — VITRO Santa Rosa (60/100)
Highest-scored facility
Converge ICT Solutions Inc.
Converge ICT Angeles Data Center
Angeles City, Pampanga, Philippines · 12 MW · 50/100
ePLDT (VITRO Inc.)
VITRO Santa Rosa
Santa Rosa, Laguna, Philippines · 100 MW · 60/100
Open Converge ICT Solutions Inc. profile →Open ePLDT (VITRO Inc.) profile →
Other comparisons
Converge ICT Solutions Inc. vs STT GDC PhilippinesConverge ICT Solutions Inc. vs Globe Telecom (GTI Corporation)STT GDC Philippines vs ePLDT (VITRO Inc.)Globe Telecom (GTI Corporation) vs ePLDT (VITRO Inc.)