Operator comparison
Internet Initiative Japan (IIJ) vs NTT Communications (NTT DOCOMO BUSINESS) — Nexcenter
Both columns come from the facilities each operator publishes and Coloprice tracks: Internet Initiative Japan (IIJ) — 12 facilities in 1 countries, NTT Communications (NTT DOCOMO BUSINESS) — Nexcenter — 10 facilities in 1 countries. Score is the independent Coloprice Score of each facility, averaged; it is never sold.
Internet Initiative Japan (IIJ)
12
Tracked facilities · Länder: 1
Betriebsländer: Japan
NTT Communications (NTT DOCOMO BUSINESS) — Nexcenter
10
Tracked facilities · Länder: 1
Betriebsländer: Japan
Portfolios side by side
| Field | Internet Initiative Japan (IIJ) | NTT Communications (NTT DOCOMO BUSINESS) — Nexcenter |
|---|---|---|
| Tracked facilities | 12 | 10 |
| Länder | 1 | 1 |
| Städte | 5 | 4 |
| Veröffentlichte IT-Kapazität | 20 MW (1 von 12 Rechenzentren veröffentlichen) | not published |
| In Betrieb | 12 | 10 |
| Im Bau / angekündigt | 0 | 0 |
| Flüssigkeitsgekühlte Rechenzentren | 0 | 7 |
| KI-fähige Rechenzentren | 0 | 1 |
| Häufigste Zertifizierungen | ISO 14001, ISO 27001, FISC, JDCC Facility Standard Tier 3 | FISC facility-standard compliance, JDCC Tier 4, NVIDIA DGX-Ready Data Center Program |
| Durchschnittlicher Coloprice Score | 11/100 über 12 bewertete Rechenzentren | 14/100 über 10 bewertete Rechenzentren |
| Auszeichnungen und Abzeichen | 2 | 1 |
| Bestbewertetes Rechenzentrum | IIJ Shiroi Data Center Campus (37/100) | Nexcenter Takamatsu 2 Data Center (35/100) |
Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-09-26; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.
Where they differ
Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.
- Tracked facilities: Internet Initiative Japan (IIJ) — 12; NTT Communications (NTT DOCOMO BUSINESS) — Nexcenter — 10
- Städte: Internet Initiative Japan (IIJ) — 5; NTT Communications (NTT DOCOMO BUSINESS) — Nexcenter — 4
- In Betrieb: Internet Initiative Japan (IIJ) — 12; NTT Communications (NTT DOCOMO BUSINESS) — Nexcenter — 10
- Flüssigkeitsgekühlte Rechenzentren: Internet Initiative Japan (IIJ) — 0; NTT Communications (NTT DOCOMO BUSINESS) — Nexcenter — 7
- KI-fähige Rechenzentren: Internet Initiative Japan (IIJ) — 0; NTT Communications (NTT DOCOMO BUSINESS) — Nexcenter — 1
- Häufigste Zertifizierungen: Internet Initiative Japan (IIJ) — ISO 14001, ISO 27001, FISC, JDCC Facility Standard Tier 3; NTT Communications (NTT DOCOMO BUSINESS) — Nexcenter — FISC facility-standard compliance, JDCC Tier 4, NVIDIA DGX-Ready Data Center Program
- Durchschnittlicher Coloprice Score: Internet Initiative Japan (IIJ) — 11/100 über 12 bewertete Rechenzentren; NTT Communications (NTT DOCOMO BUSINESS) — Nexcenter — 14/100 über 10 bewertete Rechenzentren
- Auszeichnungen und Abzeichen: Internet Initiative Japan (IIJ) — 2; NTT Communications (NTT DOCOMO BUSINESS) — Nexcenter — 1
- Bestbewertetes Rechenzentrum: Internet Initiative Japan (IIJ) — IIJ Shiroi Data Center Campus (37/100); NTT Communications (NTT DOCOMO BUSINESS) — Nexcenter — Nexcenter Takamatsu 2 Data Center (35/100)
Published for only one side: Veröffentlichte IT-Kapazität.
Bestbewertetes Rechenzentrum
Internet Initiative Japan (IIJ)
IIJ Shiroi Data Center Campus
Tokyo, Japan · 20 MW · 37/100
NTT Communications (NTT DOCOMO BUSINESS) — Nexcenter
Nexcenter Takamatsu 2 Data Center
Takamatsu, Kagawa, Japan · 35/100
Profil von Internet Initiative Japan (IIJ) öffnen →Profil von NTT Communications (NTT DOCOMO BUSINESS) — Nexcenter öffnen →
Other comparisons
Equinix vs Internet Initiative Japan (IIJ)Internet Initiative Japan (IIJ) vs MC Digital RealtyEquinix vs NTT Communications (NTT DOCOMO BUSINESS) — NexcenterMC Digital Realty vs NTT Communications (NTT DOCOMO BUSINESS) — Nexcenter