Operator comparison
Ascenty (Digital Realty) vs GTD
Both columns come from the facilities each operator publishes and Coloprice tracks: Ascenty (Digital Realty) — 36 facilities in 4 countries, GTD — 9 facilities in 2 countries. Score is the independent Coloprice Score of each facility, averaged; it is never sold.
Ascenty (Digital Realty)
36
Tracked facilities · Länder: 4
Betriebsländer: Brasilien, Chile, Kolumbien, Mexiko
GTD
9
Tracked facilities · Länder: 2
Betriebsländer: Chile, Kolumbien
Portfolios side by side
| Field | Ascenty (Digital Realty) | GTD |
|---|---|---|
| Tracked facilities | 36 | 9 |
| Länder | 4 | 2 |
| Städte | 12 | 3 |
| Veröffentlichte IT-Kapazität | 618 MW (36 von 36 Rechenzentren veröffentlichen) | 8 MW (1 von 9 Rechenzentren veröffentlichen) |
| In Betrieb | 31 | 9 |
| Im Bau / angekündigt | 5 | 0 |
| Flüssigkeitsgekühlte Rechenzentren | 1 | 0 |
| KI-fähige Rechenzentren | 1 | 0 |
| Häufigste Zertifizierungen | ISO 27001, PCI-DSS, SOC 1 Type II, SOC 2 Type II | Uptime Institute Tier III Certification of Constructed Facility, Uptime Institute Tier III Certification of Design Documents, Uptime Institute Gold Certification of Operational Sustainability, ISO 20000-1 |
| Durchschnittlicher Coloprice Score | 35/100 über 36 bewertete Rechenzentren | 19/100 über 9 bewertete Rechenzentren |
| Auszeichnungen und Abzeichen | 35 | 5 |
| Bestbewertetes Rechenzentrum | Ascenty São Paulo 5 (57/100) | GTD Panamericana (70/100) |
Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-09-26; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.
Where they differ
Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.
- Tracked facilities: Ascenty (Digital Realty) — 36; GTD — 9
- Länder: Ascenty (Digital Realty) — 4; GTD — 2
- Städte: Ascenty (Digital Realty) — 12; GTD — 3
- Veröffentlichte IT-Kapazität: Ascenty (Digital Realty) — 618 MW (36 von 36 Rechenzentren veröffentlichen); GTD — 8 MW (1 von 9 Rechenzentren veröffentlichen)
- In Betrieb: Ascenty (Digital Realty) — 31; GTD — 9
- Im Bau / angekündigt: Ascenty (Digital Realty) — 5; GTD — 0
- Flüssigkeitsgekühlte Rechenzentren: Ascenty (Digital Realty) — 1; GTD — 0
- KI-fähige Rechenzentren: Ascenty (Digital Realty) — 1; GTD — 0
- Häufigste Zertifizierungen: Ascenty (Digital Realty) — ISO 27001, PCI-DSS, SOC 1 Type II, SOC 2 Type II; GTD — Uptime Institute Tier III Certification of Constructed Facility, Uptime Institute Tier III Certification of Design Documents, Uptime Institute Gold Certification of Operational Sustainability, ISO 20000-1
- Durchschnittlicher Coloprice Score: Ascenty (Digital Realty) — 35/100 über 36 bewertete Rechenzentren; GTD — 19/100 über 9 bewertete Rechenzentren
- Auszeichnungen und Abzeichen: Ascenty (Digital Realty) — 35; GTD — 5
- Bestbewertetes Rechenzentrum: Ascenty (Digital Realty) — Ascenty São Paulo 5 (57/100); GTD — GTD Panamericana (70/100)
Bestbewertetes Rechenzentrum
Ascenty (Digital Realty)
Ascenty São Paulo 5
Osasco, Brasilien · 8 MW · 57/100
GTD
GTD Panamericana
Santiago, Chile · 8 MW · 70/100
Profil von Ascenty (Digital Realty) öffnen →Profil von GTD öffnen →
Other comparisons
Ascenty (Digital Realty) vs Scala Data CentersAscenty (Digital Realty) vs Elea Data CentersAscenty (Digital Realty) vs EquinixAscenty (Digital Realty) vs KIO NetworksAligned Data Centers vs Ascenty (Digital Realty)GTD vs Scala Data CentersEquinix vs GTD