运营商对比
DEEP (POST Luxembourg Group) vs LuxConnect
两列数据都来自各运营商公布、Coloprice 追踪的设施：DEEP (POST Luxembourg Group)——1个国家3个设施，LuxConnect——1个国家3个设施。评分是各设施独立 Coloprice Score 的平均值；评分不出售。
设施组合并排对比
| 字段 | DEEP (POST Luxembourg Group) | LuxConnect |
|---|---|---|
| 追踪的设施 | 3 | 3 |
| 国家 | 1 | 1 |
| 城市 | 3 | 2 |
| 已公布 IT 容量 | 未公布 | 未公布 |
| 运营中 | 3 | 3 |
| 在建/已宣布 | 0 | 0 |
| 液冷设施 | 0 | 0 |
| AI就绪设施 | 0 | 0 |
| 最常见的认证 | Uptime Institute Tier IV Certification of Design Documents, Uptime Institute Tier IV Certification of Constructed Facility | Uptime Institute Tier IV Certification of Design Documents, Uptime Institute Tier II Certification of Constructed Facility (separate server room), Uptime Institute Tier II Certification of Design Documents, Uptime Institute Tier II Certification of Design Documents (separate server room) |
| 平均 Coloprice Score | 39/100（基于3个已评分站点） | 39/100（基于3个已评分站点） |
| 奖项和徽章 | 2 | 1 |
| 评分最高的设施 | DEEP by POST — Resilience Centre South（42/100） | LuxConnect DC1.3（44/100） |
数量为截至 2026-10-01 的 Coloprice 目录；基准来自 The Colocation Price Index（Q3 2026）。运营商公布部分事实而非全部——空白单元格表示「未公布」，而非零。
差异之处
仅显示双方都公布且值不相同的字段。这不是评判：正确的选择取决于工作负载、合同和站点。
- 城市: DEEP (POST Luxembourg Group) — 3; LuxConnect — 2
- 最常见的认证: DEEP (POST Luxembourg Group) — Uptime Institute Tier IV Certification of Design Documents, Uptime Institute Tier IV Certification of Constructed Facility; LuxConnect — Uptime Institute Tier IV Certification of Design Documents, Uptime Institute Tier II Certification of Constructed Facility (separate server room), Uptime Institute Tier II Certification of Design Documents, Uptime Institute Tier II Certification of Design Documents (separate server room)
- 奖项和徽章: DEEP (POST Luxembourg Group) — 2; LuxConnect — 1
- 评分最高的设施: DEEP (POST Luxembourg Group) — DEEP by POST — Resilience Centre South（42/100）; LuxConnect — LuxConnect DC1.3（44/100）