▮▮Coloprice

运营商对比

Orange Romania vs Special Telecommunications Service

两列数据都来自各运营商公布、Coloprice 追踪的设施:Orange Romania——1个国家3个设施,Special Telecommunications Service——1个国家3个设施。评分是各设施独立 Coloprice Score 的平均值;评分不出售。

设施组合并排对比

字段Orange RomaniaSpecial Telecommunications Service
追踪的设施33
国家11
城市33
已公布 IT 容量未公布未公布
运营中33
在建/已宣布00
液冷设施00
AI就绪设施00
最常见的认证Uptime Institute Tier III Certification of Design DocumentsUptime Institute Tier III Certification of Design Documents Tier III Certification of Constructed Facility, Uptime Institute Tier IV Certification of Design Documents Tier IV Certification of Constructed Facility
平均 Coloprice Score15/100(基于3个已评分站点)34/100(基于3个已评分站点)
奖项和徽章23
评分最高的设施Orange Cluj-Napoca Vest(28/100)Special Telecommunications Service DC GIROC F1 (MJ + CDP II)(39/100)

数量为截至 2026-10-01 的 Coloprice 目录;基准来自 The Colocation Price Index(Q3 2026)。运营商公布部分事实而非全部——空白单元格表示「未公布」,而非零。

差异之处

仅显示双方都公布且值不相同的字段。这不是评判:正确的选择取决于工作负载、合同和站点。

  • 最常见的认证: Orange Romania — Uptime Institute Tier III Certification of Design Documents; Special Telecommunications Service — Uptime Institute Tier III Certification of Design Documents Tier III Certification of Constructed Facility, Uptime Institute Tier IV Certification of Design Documents Tier IV Certification of Constructed Facility
  • 平均 Coloprice Score: Orange Romania — 15/100(基于3个已评分站点); Special Telecommunications Service — 34/100(基于3个已评分站点)
  • 奖项和徽章: Orange Romania — 2; Special Telecommunications Service — 3
  • 评分最高的设施: Orange Romania — Orange Cluj-Napoca Vest(28/100); Special Telecommunications Service — Special Telecommunications Service DC GIROC F1 (MJ + CDP II)(39/100)

评分最高的设施

查看 Orange Romania 档案 →查看 Special Telecommunications Service 档案 →

其他对比

NXDATA vs Orange RomaniaNXDATA vs Special Telecommunications Service