▮▮Coloprice

Market comparison

Crawley, United Kingdom vs Edinburgh, United Kingdom

Both columns are built from the catalog and the price index: Crawley — 3 facilities from 2 operators, Edinburgh — 4 facilities from 2 operators. Where a benchmark or a tariff is not published, the cell says so.

Markets side by side

FieldCrawleyEdinburgh
Tracked facilities34
Operators22
Published IT capacitynot published7 MW (3 of 4 sites publish)
Operational34
Under construction / announced00
Tier III+ certified sites00
Sites with any certification21
Liquid-cooled sites00
AI-ready sites00
Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/monthnot publishednot published
Benchmark change, yoynot publishednot published
Industrial power tariff, $/kWh$0.454$0.454
Average Coloprice Score28/100 across 3 sites20/100 across 4 sites
Latency between the twonot published

Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-09-26; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.

Where they differ

Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.

  • Tracked facilities: Crawley — 3; Edinburgh — 4
  • Operational: Crawley — 3; Edinburgh — 4
  • Sites with any certification: Crawley — 2; Edinburgh — 1
  • Average Coloprice Score: Crawley — 28/100 across 3 sites; Edinburgh — 20/100 across 4 sites

Published for only one side: Published IT capacity.

Top facilities by score

Crawley, United Kingdom

Edinburgh, United Kingdom

Open Crawley data centers →Open Edinburgh data centers →Colocation pricing in Crawley →Colocation pricing in Edinburgh →

Other comparisons

Crawley vs LondonCrawley vs SloughEdinburgh vs LondonEdinburgh vs Slough