▮▮Coloprice

Market comparison

Guayaquil, Ecuador vs Quito, Ecuador

Both columns are built from the catalog and the price index: Guayaquil — 5 facilities from 5 operators, Quito — 6 facilities from 6 operators. Where a benchmark or a tariff is not published, the cell says so.

Markets side by side

FieldGuayaquilQuito
Tracked facilities56
Operators56
Published IT capacitynot publishednot published
Operational56
Under construction / announced00
Tier III+ certified sites43
Sites with any certification55
Liquid-cooled sites00
AI-ready sites00
Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/monthnot publishednot published
Benchmark change, yoynot publishednot published
Industrial power tariff, $/kWh$0.095$0.095
Average Coloprice Score28/100 across 5 sites20/100 across 6 sites
Latency between the twonot published

Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-09-26; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.

Where they differ

Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.

  • Tracked facilities: Guayaquil — 5; Quito — 6
  • Operators: Guayaquil — 5; Quito — 6
  • Operational: Guayaquil — 5; Quito — 6
  • Tier III+ certified sites: Guayaquil — 4; Quito — 3
  • Average Coloprice Score: Guayaquil — 28/100 across 5 sites; Quito — 20/100 across 6 sites

Top facilities by score

Guayaquil, Ecuador

Quito, Ecuador

Open Guayaquil data centers →Open Quito data centers →Colocation pricing in Guayaquil →Colocation pricing in Quito →