▮▮Coloprice

Market comparison

Guayaquil, Ecuador vs Quito, Ecuador

Both columns are built from the catalog and the price index: Guayaquil — 6 facilities from 6 operators, Quito — 8 facilities from 8 operators. Where a benchmark or a tariff is not published, the cell says so.

Markets side by side

FieldGuayaquilQuito
Tracked facilities68
Operators68
Published IT capacitynot publishednot published
Operational68
Under construction / announced00
Tier III+ certified sites54
Sites with any certification66
Liquid-cooled sites00
AI-ready sites00
Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/monthnot publishednot published
Benchmark change, yoynot publishednot published
Industrial power tariff, $/kWh$0.095$0.095
Average Coloprice Score29/100 across 6 sites20/100 across 8 sites
Latency between the twonot published

Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-10-01; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.

Where they differ

Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.

  • Tracked facilities: Guayaquil — 6; Quito — 8
  • Operators: Guayaquil — 6; Quito — 8
  • Operational: Guayaquil — 6; Quito — 8
  • Tier III+ certified sites: Guayaquil — 5; Quito — 4
  • Average Coloprice Score: Guayaquil — 29/100 across 6 sites; Quito — 20/100 across 8 sites

Top facilities by score

Guayaquil, Ecuador

Quito, Ecuador

Open Guayaquil data centers →Open Quito data centers →Colocation pricing in Guayaquil →Colocation pricing in Quito →