▮▮Coloprice

Market comparison

Baghdad, Iraq vs Erbil, Iraq

Both columns are built from the catalog and the price index: Baghdad — 9 facilities from 8 operators, Erbil — 4 facilities from 4 operators. Where a benchmark or a tariff is not published, the cell says so.

Markets side by side

FieldBaghdadErbil
Tracked facilities94
Operators84
Published IT capacity12 MW (1 of 9 sites publish)not published
Operational84
Under construction / announced10
Tier III+ certified sites83
Sites with any certification83
Liquid-cooled sites00
AI-ready sites00
Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/monthnot publishednot published
Benchmark change, yoynot publishednot published
Industrial power tariff, $/kWh$0.046$0.046
Average Coloprice Score28/100 across 9 sites26/100 across 4 sites
Latency between the twonot published

Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-10-01; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.

Where they differ

Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.

  • Tracked facilities: Baghdad — 9; Erbil — 4
  • Operators: Baghdad — 8; Erbil — 4
  • Operational: Baghdad — 8; Erbil — 4
  • Under construction / announced: Baghdad — 1; Erbil — 0
  • Tier III+ certified sites: Baghdad — 8; Erbil — 3
  • Sites with any certification: Baghdad — 8; Erbil — 3
  • Average Coloprice Score: Baghdad — 28/100 across 9 sites; Erbil — 26/100 across 4 sites

Published for only one side: Published IT capacity.

Top facilities by score

Open Baghdad data centers →Open Erbil data centers →Colocation pricing in Baghdad →Colocation pricing in Erbil →