▮▮Coloprice

Market comparison

Łódź, Poland vs Wrocław, Poland

Both columns are built from the catalog and the price index: Łódź — 3 facilities from 3 operators, Wrocław — 4 facilities from 4 operators. Where a benchmark or a tariff is not published, the cell says so.

Markets side by side

FieldŁódźWrocław
Tracked facilities34
Operators34
Published IT capacitynot publishednot published
Operational34
Under construction / announced00
Tier III+ certified sites00
Sites with any certification12
Liquid-cooled sites00
AI-ready sites00
Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/monthnot publishednot published
Benchmark change, yoynot publishednot published
Industrial power tariff, $/kWh$0.177$0.177
Average Coloprice Score11/100 across 3 sites12/100 across 4 sites
Latency between the twonot published

Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-09-26; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.

Where they differ

Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.

  • Tracked facilities: Łódź — 3; Wrocław — 4
  • Operators: Łódź — 3; Wrocław — 4
  • Operational: Łódź — 3; Wrocław — 4
  • Sites with any certification: Łódź — 1; Wrocław — 2
  • Average Coloprice Score: Łódź — 11/100 across 3 sites; Wrocław — 12/100 across 4 sites

Top facilities by score

Łódź, Poland

Open Łódź data centers →Open Wrocław data centers →Colocation pricing in Łódź →Colocation pricing in Wrocław →

Other comparisons

Łódź vs WarsawGdańsk vs ŁódźWarsaw vs WrocławGdańsk vs Wrocław