▮▮Coloprice

Market comparison

Warsaw, Poland vs Wrocław, Poland

Both columns are built from the catalog and the price index: Warsaw — 17 facilities from 11 operators, Wrocław — 4 facilities from 4 operators. Where a benchmark or a tariff is not published, the cell says so.

Markets side by side

FieldWarsawWrocław
Tracked facilities174
Operators114
Published IT capacity154 MW (8 of 17 sites publish)not published
Operational164
Under construction / announced10
Tier III+ certified sites00
Sites with any certification122
Liquid-cooled sites10
AI-ready sites10
Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/monthnot publishednot published
Benchmark change, yoynot publishednot published
Industrial power tariff, $/kWh$0.177$0.177
Average Coloprice Score28/100 across 17 sites12/100 across 4 sites
Latency between the twonot published

Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-09-26; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.

Where they differ

Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.

  • Tracked facilities: Warsaw — 17; Wrocław — 4
  • Operators: Warsaw — 11; Wrocław — 4
  • Operational: Warsaw — 16; Wrocław — 4
  • Under construction / announced: Warsaw — 1; Wrocław — 0
  • Sites with any certification: Warsaw — 12; Wrocław — 2
  • Liquid-cooled sites: Warsaw — 1; Wrocław — 0
  • AI-ready sites: Warsaw — 1; Wrocław — 0
  • Average Coloprice Score: Warsaw — 28/100 across 17 sites; Wrocław — 12/100 across 4 sites

Published for only one side: Published IT capacity.

Top facilities by score

Warsaw, Poland

Open Warsaw data centers →Open Wrocław data centers →Colocation pricing in Warsaw →Colocation pricing in Wrocław →

Other comparisons

Gdańsk vs WarsawŁódź vs WarsawGdańsk vs WrocławŁódź vs Wrocław