▮▮Coloprice

Market comparison

Warsaw, Poland vs Wrocław, Poland

Both columns are built from the catalog and the price index: Warsaw — 28 facilities from 17 operators, Wrocław — 7 facilities from 7 operators. Where a benchmark or a tariff is not published, the cell says so.

Markets side by side

FieldWarsawWrocław
Tracked facilities287
Operators177
Published IT capacity154 MW (8 of 28 sites publish)not published
Operational277
Under construction / announced10
Tier III+ certified sites10
Sites with any certification132
Liquid-cooled sites10
AI-ready sites10
Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/monthnot publishednot published
Benchmark change, yoynot publishednot published
Industrial power tariff, $/kWh$0.177$0.177
Average Coloprice Score21/100 across 28 sites11/100 across 7 sites
Latency between the twonot published

Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-10-01; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.

Where they differ

Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.

  • Tracked facilities: Warsaw — 28; Wrocław — 7
  • Operators: Warsaw — 17; Wrocław — 7
  • Operational: Warsaw — 27; Wrocław — 7
  • Under construction / announced: Warsaw — 1; Wrocław — 0
  • Tier III+ certified sites: Warsaw — 1; Wrocław — 0
  • Sites with any certification: Warsaw — 13; Wrocław — 2
  • Liquid-cooled sites: Warsaw — 1; Wrocław — 0
  • AI-ready sites: Warsaw — 1; Wrocław — 0
  • Average Coloprice Score: Warsaw — 21/100 across 28 sites; Wrocław — 11/100 across 7 sites

Published for only one side: Published IT capacity.

Top facilities by score

Warsaw, Poland

Open Warsaw data centers →Open Wrocław data centers →Colocation pricing in Warsaw →Colocation pricing in Wrocław →

Other comparisons

Poznań vs WarsawKatowice vs WarsawPoznań vs WrocławKatowice vs Wrocław