▮▮Coloprice

Market comparison

Carnaxide, Portugal vs Lisbon, Portugal

Both columns are built from the catalog and the price index: Carnaxide — 3 facilities from 2 operators, Lisbon — 7 facilities from 6 operators. Where a benchmark or a tariff is not published, the cell says so.

Markets side by side

FieldCarnaxideLisbon
Tracked facilities37
Operators26
Published IT capacity21 MW (2 of 3 sites publish)not published
Operational27
Under construction / announced10
Tier III+ certified sites00
Sites with any certification10
Liquid-cooled sites00
AI-ready sites00
Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/monthnot publishednot published
Benchmark change, yoynot publishednot published
Industrial power tariff, $/kWh$0.176$0.176
Average Coloprice Score22/100 across 3 sites10/100 across 7 sites
Latency between the twonot published

Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-10-01; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.

Where they differ

Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.

  • Tracked facilities: Carnaxide — 3; Lisbon — 7
  • Operators: Carnaxide — 2; Lisbon — 6
  • Operational: Carnaxide — 2; Lisbon — 7
  • Under construction / announced: Carnaxide — 1; Lisbon — 0
  • Sites with any certification: Carnaxide — 1; Lisbon — 0
  • Average Coloprice Score: Carnaxide — 22/100 across 3 sites; Lisbon — 10/100 across 7 sites

Published for only one side: Published IT capacity.

Top facilities by score

Carnaxide, Portugal

Lisbon, Portugal

Open Carnaxide data centers →Open Lisbon data centers →Colocation pricing in Carnaxide →Colocation pricing in Lisbon →

Other comparisons

Lisbon vs Madrid