▮▮Coloprice

Market comparison

Malmö, Sweden vs Stockholm, Sweden

Both columns are built from the catalog and the price index: Malmö — 4 facilities from 4 operators, Stockholm — 33 facilities from 14 operators. Where a benchmark or a tariff is not published, the cell says so.

Markets side by side

FieldMalmöStockholm
Tracked facilities433
Operators414
Published IT capacitynot published104 MW (12 of 33 sites publish)
Operational432
Under construction / announced01
Tier III+ certified sites00
Sites with any certification021
Liquid-cooled sites03
AI-ready sites06
Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/monthnot publishednot published
Benchmark change, yoynot publishednot published
Industrial power tariff, $/kWh$0.1$0.1
Average Coloprice Score9/100 across 4 sites24/100 across 33 sites
Latency between the twonot published

Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-10-01; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.

Where they differ

Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.

  • Tracked facilities: Malmö — 4; Stockholm — 33
  • Operators: Malmö — 4; Stockholm — 14
  • Operational: Malmö — 4; Stockholm — 32
  • Under construction / announced: Malmö — 0; Stockholm — 1
  • Sites with any certification: Malmö — 0; Stockholm — 21
  • Liquid-cooled sites: Malmö — 0; Stockholm — 3
  • AI-ready sites: Malmö — 0; Stockholm — 6
  • Average Coloprice Score: Malmö — 9/100 across 4 sites; Stockholm — 24/100 across 33 sites

Published for only one side: Published IT capacity.

Top facilities by score

Malmö, Sweden

Stockholm, Sweden

Open Malmö data centers →Open Stockholm data centers →Colocation pricing in Malmö →Colocation pricing in Stockholm →