▮▮Coloprice

Operator comparison

NXDATA vs Orange Romania

Both columns come from the facilities each operator publishes and Coloprice tracks: NXDATA — 3 facilities in 1 countries, Orange Romania — 3 facilities in 1 countries. Score is the independent Coloprice Score of each facility, averaged; it is never sold.

Portfolios side by side

FieldNXDATAOrange Romania
Tracked facilities33
Countries11
Cities23
Published IT capacity5 MW (1 of 3 sites publish)not published
Operational23
Under construction / announced10
Liquid-cooled sites00
AI-ready sites00
Most common certificationsnot publishedUptime Institute Tier III Certification of Design Documents
Average Coloprice Score13/100 across 3 scored sites15/100 across 3 scored sites
Awards and badges52
Highest-scored facilityNXDATA-3 (20/100)Orange Cluj-Napoca Vest (28/100)

Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-10-01; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.

Where they differ

Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.

  • Cities: NXDATA — 2; Orange Romania — 3
  • Operational: NXDATA — 2; Orange Romania — 3
  • Under construction / announced: NXDATA — 1; Orange Romania — 0
  • Average Coloprice Score: NXDATA — 13/100 across 3 scored sites; Orange Romania — 15/100 across 3 scored sites
  • Awards and badges: NXDATA — 5; Orange Romania — 2
  • Highest-scored facility: NXDATA — NXDATA-3 (20/100); Orange Romania — Orange Cluj-Napoca Vest (28/100)

Published for only one side: Published IT capacity, Most common certifications.

Highest-scored facility

Open NXDATA profile →Open Orange Romania profile →

Other comparisons

NXDATA vs Special Telecommunications ServiceOrange Romania vs Special Telecommunications Service