▮▮Coloprice

Market comparison

Innsbruck, Austria vs Salzburg, Austria

Both columns are built from the catalog and the price index: Innsbruck — 3 facilities from 2 operators, Salzburg — 4 facilities from 4 operators. Where a benchmark or a tariff is not published, the cell says so.

Markets side by side

FieldInnsbruckSalzburg
Tracked facilities34
Operators24
Published IT capacitynot publishednot published
Operational34
Under construction / announced00
Tier III+ certified sites00
Sites with any certification00
Liquid-cooled sites00
AI-ready sites00
Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/monthnot publishednot published
Benchmark change, yoynot publishednot published
Industrial power tariff, $/kWh$0.302$0.302
Average Coloprice Score9/100 across 3 sites9/100 across 4 sites
Latency between the twonot published

Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-10-01; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.

Where they differ

Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.

  • Tracked facilities: Innsbruck — 3; Salzburg — 4
  • Operators: Innsbruck — 2; Salzburg — 4
  • Operational: Innsbruck — 3; Salzburg — 4
  • Average Coloprice Score: Innsbruck — 9/100 across 3 sites; Salzburg — 9/100 across 4 sites

Top facilities by score

Innsbruck, Austria

Salzburg, Austria

Open Innsbruck data centers →Open Salzburg data centers →Colocation pricing in Innsbruck →Colocation pricing in Salzburg →

Other comparisons

Innsbruck vs ViennaSalzburg vs Vienna