▮▮Coloprice

Market comparison

Salzburg, Austria vs Vienna, Austria

Both columns are built from the catalog and the price index: Salzburg — 4 facilities from 4 operators, Vienna — 24 facilities from 15 operators. Where a benchmark or a tariff is not published, the cell says so.

Markets side by side

FieldSalzburgVienna
Tracked facilities424
Operators415
Published IT capacitynot published30 MW (5 of 24 sites publish)
Operational422
Under construction / announced02
Tier III+ certified sites00
Sites with any certification05
Liquid-cooled sites00
AI-ready sites00
Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/monthnot publishednot published
Benchmark change, yoynot publishednot published
Industrial power tariff, $/kWh$0.302$0.302
Average Coloprice Score9/100 across 4 sites16/100 across 24 sites
Latency between the twonot published

Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-10-01; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.

Where they differ

Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.

  • Tracked facilities: Salzburg — 4; Vienna — 24
  • Operators: Salzburg — 4; Vienna — 15
  • Operational: Salzburg — 4; Vienna — 22
  • Under construction / announced: Salzburg — 0; Vienna — 2
  • Sites with any certification: Salzburg — 0; Vienna — 5
  • Average Coloprice Score: Salzburg — 9/100 across 4 sites; Vienna — 16/100 across 24 sites

Published for only one side: Published IT capacity.

Top facilities by score

Salzburg, Austria

Vienna, Austria

Open Salzburg data centers →Open Vienna data centers →Colocation pricing in Salzburg →Colocation pricing in Vienna →

Other comparisons

Innsbruck vs SalzburgInnsbruck vs Vienna