▮▮Coloprice

Market comparison

Rio de Janeiro, Brazil vs São Paulo, Brazil

Both columns are built from the catalog and the price index: Rio de Janeiro — 10 facilities from 7 operators, São Paulo — 10 facilities from 9 operators. Where a benchmark or a tariff is not published, the cell says so.

Markets side by side

FieldRio de JaneiroSão Paulo
Tracked facilities1010
Operators79
Published IT capacity63 MW (3 of 10 sites publish)313 MW (4 of 10 sites publish)
Operational99
Under construction / announced11
Tier III+ certified sites25
Sites with any certification35
Liquid-cooled sites10
AI-ready sites00
Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/month$160 (country-level)$160 (country-level)
Benchmark change, yoy0%0%
Industrial power tariff, $/kWh$0.152$0.152
Average Coloprice Score19/100 across 10 sites23/100 across 10 sites
Latency between the twonot published

Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-09-26; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.

Where they differ

Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.

  • Operators: Rio de Janeiro — 7; São Paulo — 9
  • Published IT capacity: Rio de Janeiro — 63 MW (3 of 10 sites publish); São Paulo — 313 MW (4 of 10 sites publish)
  • Tier III+ certified sites: Rio de Janeiro — 2; São Paulo — 5
  • Sites with any certification: Rio de Janeiro — 3; São Paulo — 5
  • Liquid-cooled sites: Rio de Janeiro — 1; São Paulo — 0
  • Average Coloprice Score: Rio de Janeiro — 19/100 across 10 sites; São Paulo — 23/100 across 10 sites

Top facilities by score

Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

São Paulo, Brazil

Open Rio de Janeiro data centers →Open São Paulo data centers →Colocation pricing in Rio de Janeiro →Colocation pricing in São Paulo →

Other comparisons

Barueri vs Rio de JaneiroOsasco vs Rio de JaneiroBarueri vs São PauloOsasco vs São Paulo