▮▮Coloprice

Market comparison

Limassol, Cyprus vs Nicosia, Cyprus

Both columns are built from the catalog and the price index: Limassol — 3 facilities from 3 operators, Nicosia — 4 facilities from 4 operators. Where a benchmark or a tariff is not published, the cell says so.

Markets side by side

FieldLimassolNicosia
Tracked facilities34
Operators34
Published IT capacitynot publishednot published
Operational33
Under construction / announced01
Tier III+ certified sites22
Sites with any certification34
Liquid-cooled sites00
AI-ready sites00
Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/monthnot publishednot published
Benchmark change, yoynot publishednot published
Industrial power tariff, $/kWh$0.308$0.308
Average Coloprice Score28/100 across 3 sites17/100 across 4 sites
Latency between the twonot published

Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-09-26; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.

Where they differ

Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.

  • Tracked facilities: Limassol — 3; Nicosia — 4
  • Operators: Limassol — 3; Nicosia — 4
  • Under construction / announced: Limassol — 0; Nicosia — 1
  • Sites with any certification: Limassol — 3; Nicosia — 4
  • Average Coloprice Score: Limassol — 28/100 across 3 sites; Nicosia — 17/100 across 4 sites

Top facilities by score

Open Limassol data centers →Open Nicosia data centers →Colocation pricing in Limassol →Colocation pricing in Nicosia →