▮▮Coloprice

Market comparison

Mexico City, Mexico vs Monterrey, Mexico

Both columns are built from the catalog and the price index: Mexico City — 5 facilities from 3 operators, Monterrey — 3 facilities from 3 operators. Where a benchmark or a tariff is not published, the cell says so.

Markets side by side

FieldMexico CityMonterrey
Tracked facilities53
Operators33
Published IT capacity6 MW (1 of 5 sites publish)not published
Operational53
Under construction / announced00
Tier III+ certified sites31
Sites with any certification52
Liquid-cooled sites00
AI-ready sites00
Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/month$260 (country-level)$260 (country-level)
Benchmark change, yoy0%0%
Industrial power tariff, $/kWh$0.241$0.241
Average Coloprice Score33/100 across 5 sites16/100 across 3 sites
Latency between the twonot published

Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-09-26; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.

Where they differ

Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.

  • Tracked facilities: Mexico City — 5; Monterrey — 3
  • Operational: Mexico City — 5; Monterrey — 3
  • Tier III+ certified sites: Mexico City — 3; Monterrey — 1
  • Sites with any certification: Mexico City — 5; Monterrey — 2
  • Average Coloprice Score: Mexico City — 33/100 across 5 sites; Monterrey — 16/100 across 3 sites

Published for only one side: Published IT capacity.

Top facilities by score

Mexico City, Mexico

Monterrey, Mexico

Open Mexico City data centers →Open Monterrey data centers →Colocation pricing in Mexico City →Colocation pricing in Monterrey →

Other comparisons

Mexico City vs QuerétaroMonterrey vs Querétaro