▮▮Coloprice

Market comparison

Christchurch, New Zealand vs Wellington (Te Aro), New Zealand

Both columns are built from the catalog and the price index: Christchurch — 8 facilities from 7 operators, Wellington (Te Aro) — 7 facilities from 7 operators. Where a benchmark or a tariff is not published, the cell says so.

Markets side by side

FieldChristchurchWellington (Te Aro)
Tracked facilities87
Operators77
Published IT capacity1 MW (1 of 8 sites publish)2 MW (1 of 7 sites publish)
Operational87
Under construction / announced00
Tier III+ certified sites00
Sites with any certification11
Liquid-cooled sites00
AI-ready sites00
Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/monthnot publishednot published
Benchmark change, yoynot publishednot published
Industrial power tariff, $/kWhnot publishednot published
Average Coloprice Score11/100 across 8 sites12/100 across 7 sites
Latency between the twonot published

Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-10-01; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.

Where they differ

Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.

  • Tracked facilities: Christchurch — 8; Wellington (Te Aro) — 7
  • Published IT capacity: Christchurch — 1 MW (1 of 8 sites publish); Wellington (Te Aro) — 2 MW (1 of 7 sites publish)
  • Operational: Christchurch — 8; Wellington (Te Aro) — 7
  • Average Coloprice Score: Christchurch — 11/100 across 8 sites; Wellington (Te Aro) — 12/100 across 7 sites

Top facilities by score

Christchurch, New Zealand

Wellington (Te Aro), New Zealand

Open Christchurch data centers →Open Wellington (Te Aro) data centers →Colocation pricing in Christchurch →Colocation pricing in Wellington (Te Aro) →

Other comparisons

Auckland (Silverdale) vs ChristchurchChristchurch vs HamiltonAuckland (Silverdale) vs Wellington (Te Aro)Hamilton vs Wellington (Te Aro)