▮▮Coloprice

Market comparison

Leeds, United Kingdom vs Manchester, United Kingdom

Both columns are built from the catalog and the price index: Leeds — 7 facilities from 5 operators, Manchester — 12 facilities from 8 operators. Where a benchmark or a tariff is not published, the cell says so.

Markets side by side

FieldLeedsManchester
Tracked facilities712
Operators58
Published IT capacitynot published1 MW (1 of 12 sites publish)
Operational712
Under construction / announced00
Tier III+ certified sites00
Sites with any certification11
Liquid-cooled sites00
AI-ready sites00
Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/month$213 (country-level)$213 (country-level)
Benchmark change, yoynot publishednot published
Industrial power tariff, $/kWh$0.454$0.454
Average Coloprice Score11/100 across 7 sites13/100 across 12 sites
Latency between the twonot published

Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-10-01; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.

Where they differ

Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.

  • Tracked facilities: Leeds — 7; Manchester — 12
  • Operators: Leeds — 5; Manchester — 8
  • Operational: Leeds — 7; Manchester — 12
  • Average Coloprice Score: Leeds — 11/100 across 7 sites; Manchester — 13/100 across 12 sites

Published for only one side: Published IT capacity.

Top facilities by score

Leeds, United Kingdom

Manchester, United Kingdom

Open Leeds data centers →Open Manchester data centers →Colocation pricing in Leeds →Colocation pricing in Manchester →

Other comparisons

Leeds vs LondonLeeds vs SloughLondon vs ManchesterManchester vs Slough