▮▮Coloprice

Market comparison

Leeds, United Kingdom vs Slough, United Kingdom

Both columns are built from the catalog and the price index: Leeds — 7 facilities from 5 operators, Slough — 23 facilities from 10 operators. Where a benchmark or a tariff is not published, the cell says so.

Markets side by side

FieldLeedsSlough
Tracked facilities723
Operators510
Published IT capacitynot published239 MW (10 of 23 sites publish)
Operational722
Under construction / announced01
Tier III+ certified sites00
Sites with any certification113
Liquid-cooled sites01
AI-ready sites01
Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/month$213 (country-level)$213 (country-level)
Benchmark change, yoynot publishednot published
Industrial power tariff, $/kWh$0.454$0.454
Average Coloprice Score11/100 across 7 sites28/100 across 23 sites
Latency between the twonot published

Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-10-01; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.

Where they differ

Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.

  • Tracked facilities: Leeds — 7; Slough — 23
  • Operators: Leeds — 5; Slough — 10
  • Operational: Leeds — 7; Slough — 22
  • Under construction / announced: Leeds — 0; Slough — 1
  • Sites with any certification: Leeds — 1; Slough — 13
  • Liquid-cooled sites: Leeds — 0; Slough — 1
  • AI-ready sites: Leeds — 0; Slough — 1
  • Average Coloprice Score: Leeds — 11/100 across 7 sites; Slough — 28/100 across 23 sites

Published for only one side: Published IT capacity.

Top facilities by score

Leeds, United Kingdom

Slough, United Kingdom

Open Leeds data centers →Open Slough data centers →Colocation pricing in Leeds →Colocation pricing in Slough →

Other comparisons

Leeds vs LondonLeeds vs ManchesterLondon vs SloughManchester vs Slough