▮▮Coloprice

Operator comparison

A1 Telekom Austria vs eww

Both columns come from the facilities each operator publishes and Coloprice tracks: A1 Telekom Austria — 3 facilities in 1 countries, eww — 3 facilities in 1 countries. Score is the independent Coloprice Score of each facility, averaged; it is never sold.

Portfolios side by side

FieldA1 Telekom Austriaeww
Tracked facilities33
Countries11
Cities13
Published IT capacity4 MW (1 of 3 sites publish)not published
Operational33
Under construction / announced00
Liquid-cooled sites00
AI-ready sites00
Most common certificationsnot publishednot published
Average Coloprice Score16/100 across 3 scored sites9/100 across 3 scored sites
Awards and badges51
Highest-scored facilityA1 Next Generation Data Center (Paukerwerkstraße) (29/100)ITandTEL TechCenter Linz (9/100)

Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-10-01; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.

Where they differ

Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.

  • Cities: A1 Telekom Austria — 1; eww — 3
  • Average Coloprice Score: A1 Telekom Austria — 16/100 across 3 scored sites; eww — 9/100 across 3 scored sites
  • Awards and badges: A1 Telekom Austria — 5; eww — 1
  • Highest-scored facility: A1 Telekom Austria — A1 Next Generation Data Center (Paukerwerkstraße) (29/100); eww — ITandTEL TechCenter Linz (9/100)

Published for only one side: Published IT capacity.

Highest-scored facility

Open A1 Telekom Austria profile →Open eww profile →

Other comparisons

A1 Telekom Austria vs AtlasEdgeA1 Telekom Austria vs Digital Realty (Interxion)AtlasEdge vs ewwDigital Realty (Interxion) vs eww