▮▮Coloprice

Operator comparison

Bezeq International vs Cellcom Israel

Both columns come from the facilities each operator publishes and Coloprice tracks: Bezeq International — 4 facilities in 1 countries, Cellcom Israel — 3 facilities in 1 countries. Score is the independent Coloprice Score of each facility, averaged; it is never sold.

Portfolios side by side

FieldBezeq InternationalCellcom Israel
Tracked facilities43
Countries11
Cities33
Published IT capacitynot publishednot published
Operational43
Under construction / announced00
Liquid-cooled sites00
AI-ready sites00
Most common certificationsnot publishednot published
Average Coloprice Score9/100 across 4 scored sites9/100 across 3 scored sites
Awards and badges2not published
Highest-scored facilityBezeq International Shacham Data Center (9/100)Cellcom Israel Netanya Data center (9/100)

Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-10-01; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.

Where they differ

Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.

  • Tracked facilities: Bezeq International — 4; Cellcom Israel — 3
  • Operational: Bezeq International — 4; Cellcom Israel — 3
  • Average Coloprice Score: Bezeq International — 9/100 across 4 scored sites; Cellcom Israel — 9/100 across 3 scored sites
  • Highest-scored facility: Bezeq International — Bezeq International Shacham Data Center (9/100); Cellcom Israel — Cellcom Israel Netanya Data center (9/100)

Published for only one side: Awards and badges.

Highest-scored facility

Open Bezeq International profile →Open Cellcom Israel profile →

Other comparisons

Bezeq International vs Bynet Data CentersBezeq International vs EdgeConneXBynet Data Centers vs Cellcom IsraelCellcom Israel vs EdgeConneX