▮▮Coloprice

Operator comparison

Bynet Data Centers vs Cellcom Israel

Both columns come from the facilities each operator publishes and Coloprice tracks: Bynet Data Centers — 3 facilities in 1 countries, Cellcom Israel — 3 facilities in 1 countries. Score is the independent Coloprice Score of each facility, averaged; it is never sold.

Portfolios side by side

FieldBynet Data CentersCellcom Israel
Tracked facilities33
Countries11
Cities23
Published IT capacity2 MW (3 of 3 sites publish)not published
Operational33
Under construction / announced00
Liquid-cooled sites00
AI-ready sites00
Most common certificationsTIER 3 (per operator, design claim)not published
Average Coloprice Score17/100 across 3 scored sites9/100 across 3 scored sites
Awards and badges3not published
Highest-scored facilityBynet LOD (22/100)Cellcom Israel Netanya Data center (9/100)

Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-10-01; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.

Where they differ

Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.

  • Cities: Bynet Data Centers — 2; Cellcom Israel — 3
  • Average Coloprice Score: Bynet Data Centers — 17/100 across 3 scored sites; Cellcom Israel — 9/100 across 3 scored sites
  • Highest-scored facility: Bynet Data Centers — Bynet LOD (22/100); Cellcom Israel — Cellcom Israel Netanya Data center (9/100)

Published for only one side: Published IT capacity, Most common certifications, Awards and badges.

Highest-scored facility

Open Bynet Data Centers profile →Open Cellcom Israel profile →

Other comparisons

Bezeq International vs Bynet Data CentersBynet Data Centers vs EdgeConneXBezeq International vs Cellcom IsraelCellcom Israel vs EdgeConneX