▮▮Coloprice

Operator comparison

Colt vs Retelit

Both columns come from the facilities each operator publishes and Coloprice tracks: Colt — 12 facilities in 7 countries, Retelit — 6 facilities in 1 countries. Score is the independent Coloprice Score of each facility, averaged; it is never sold.

Portfolios side by side

FieldColtRetelit
Tracked facilities126
Countries71
Cities124
Published IT capacitynot published18 MW (2 of 6 sites publish)
Operational125
Under construction / announced01
Liquid-cooled sites00
AI-ready sites00
Most common certificationsnot publishedANSI/TIA-942 Rating 4 (per operator), Tier IV-certified (per operator)
Average Coloprice Score9/100 across 12 scored sites15/100 across 6 scored sites
Awards and badges21
Highest-scored facilityLevel 3 (Century Link) Brussels (9/100)Avalon 1 (Retelit) (24/100)

Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-10-01; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.

Where they differ

Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.

  • Tracked facilities: Colt — 12; Retelit — 6
  • Countries: Colt — 7; Retelit — 1
  • Cities: Colt — 12; Retelit — 4
  • Operational: Colt — 12; Retelit — 5
  • Under construction / announced: Colt — 0; Retelit — 1
  • Average Coloprice Score: Colt — 9/100 across 12 scored sites; Retelit — 15/100 across 6 scored sites
  • Awards and badges: Colt — 2; Retelit — 1
  • Highest-scored facility: Colt — Level 3 (Century Link) Brussels (9/100); Retelit — Avalon 1 (Retelit) (24/100)

Published for only one side: Published IT capacity, Most common certifications.

Highest-scored facility

Open Colt profile →Open Retelit profile →

Other comparisons

Colt vs STACK InfrastructureColt vs EquinixRetelit vs STACK InfrastructureEquinix vs Retelit