▮▮Coloprice

Operator comparison

HostDime vs InterNexa

Both columns come from the facilities each operator publishes and Coloprice tracks: HostDime — 8 facilities in 4 countries, InterNexa — 3 facilities in 1 countries. Score is the independent Coloprice Score of each facility, averaged; it is never sold.

Portfolios side by side

FieldHostDimeInterNexa
Tracked facilities83
Countries41
Cities73
Published IT capacity16 MW (3 of 8 sites publish)not published
Operational83
Under construction / announced00
Liquid-cooled sites00
AI-ready sites00
Most common certificationsPCI, SOC 2 Type II, Tier III Design Certified by Uptime Institute, Uptime Institute Tier IV Certification of Design Documentsnot published
Average Coloprice Score29/100 across 8 scored sites9/100 across 3 scored sites
Awards and badges6not published
Highest-scored facilityHostDime Cotia (São Paulo) (54/100)Internexa Medellin Colombia (9/100)

Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-10-01; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.

Where they differ

Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.

  • Tracked facilities: HostDime — 8; InterNexa — 3
  • Countries: HostDime — 4; InterNexa — 1
  • Cities: HostDime — 7; InterNexa — 3
  • Operational: HostDime — 8; InterNexa — 3
  • Average Coloprice Score: HostDime — 29/100 across 8 scored sites; InterNexa — 9/100 across 3 scored sites
  • Highest-scored facility: HostDime — HostDime Cotia (São Paulo) (54/100); InterNexa — Internexa Medellin Colombia (9/100)

Published for only one side: Published IT capacity, Most common certifications, Awards and badges.

Highest-scored facility

Open HostDime profile →Open InterNexa profile →

Other comparisons

Aligned Data Centers vs HostDimeHostDime vs Tecto Data CentersAligned Data Centers vs InterNexaInterNexa vs Tecto Data Centers