▮▮Coloprice

Operator comparison

NEXTDC vs Vocus

Both columns come from the facilities each operator publishes and Coloprice tracks: NEXTDC — 27 facilities in 3 countries, Vocus — 9 facilities in 1 countries. Score is the independent Coloprice Score of each facility, averaged; it is never sold.

Portfolios side by side

FieldNEXTDCVocus
Tracked facilities279
Countries31
Cities148
Published IT capacity1,791 MW (26 of 27 sites publish)not published
Operational189
Under construction / announced90
Liquid-cooled sites00
AI-ready sites20
Most common certificationsUptime Institute Tier IV Certification of Constructed Facility, ISO 14001, ISO 27001, ISO 45001not published
Average Coloprice Score38/100 across 27 scored sites9/100 across 9 scored sites
Awards and badges69not published
Highest-scored facilityNEXTDC S3 Sydney (82/100)Vocus Data Centre Melbourne (9/100)

Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-10-01; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.

Where they differ

Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.

  • Tracked facilities: NEXTDC — 27; Vocus — 9
  • Countries: NEXTDC — 3; Vocus — 1
  • Cities: NEXTDC — 14; Vocus — 8
  • Operational: NEXTDC — 18; Vocus — 9
  • Under construction / announced: NEXTDC — 9; Vocus — 0
  • AI-ready sites: NEXTDC — 2; Vocus — 0
  • Average Coloprice Score: NEXTDC — 38/100 across 27 scored sites; Vocus — 9/100 across 9 scored sites
  • Highest-scored facility: NEXTDC — NEXTDC S3 Sydney (82/100); Vocus — Vocus Data Centre Melbourne (9/100)

Published for only one side: Published IT capacity, Most common certifications, Awards and badges.

Highest-scored facility

Open NEXTDC profile →Open Vocus profile →

Other comparisons

Equinix vs NEXTDCCDC Data Centres vs NEXTDCEquinix vs VocusCDC Data Centres vs Vocus