▮▮Coloprice

Operator comparison

Pulsant vs Stellanor

Both columns come from the facilities each operator publishes and Coloprice tracks: Pulsant — 14 facilities in 1 countries, Stellanor — 8 facilities in 1 countries. Score is the independent Coloprice Score of each facility, averaged; it is never sold.

Portfolios side by side

FieldPulsantStellanor
Tracked facilities148
Countries11
Cities105
Published IT capacity22 MW (14 of 14 sites publish)5 MW (1 of 8 sites publish)
Operational148
Under construction / announced00
Liquid-cooled sites00
AI-ready sites00
Most common certificationsnot publishednot published
Average Coloprice Score21/100 across 14 scored sites14/100 across 8 scored sites
Awards and badges1not published
Highest-scored facilityPulsant Edinburgh SC-1 (South Gyle) (24/100)Stellanor Woking (24/100)

Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-09-26; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.

Where they differ

Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.

  • Tracked facilities: Pulsant — 14; Stellanor — 8
  • Cities: Pulsant — 10; Stellanor — 5
  • Published IT capacity: Pulsant — 22 MW (14 of 14 sites publish); Stellanor — 5 MW (1 of 8 sites publish)
  • Operational: Pulsant — 14; Stellanor — 8
  • Average Coloprice Score: Pulsant — 21/100 across 14 scored sites; Stellanor — 14/100 across 8 scored sites
  • Highest-scored facility: Pulsant — Pulsant Edinburgh SC-1 (South Gyle) (24/100); Stellanor — Stellanor Woking (24/100)

Published for only one side: Awards and badges.

Highest-scored facility

Open Pulsant profile →Open Stellanor profile →

Other comparisons

Digital Realty (Interxion) vs PulsantEquinix vs PulsantDigital Realty (Interxion) vs StellanorEquinix vs Stellanor