▮▮Coloprice

BESS comparison

EVE Energy Liquid Cooling BESS Container BP-52-166.4/314-L vs ZOE Energy Storage Z BOX-P 6200 2H

Both columns come from what EVE Energy and ZOE Energy Storage publish. Fields either maker does not publish are marked «not published»; we do not estimate or rank.

Specifications side by side

FieldEVE Energy Liquid Cooling BESS Container BP-52-166.4/314-LZOE Energy Storage Z BOX-P 6200 2H
Max energy per enclosure5.016 MWh6.25 MWh
Max power per enclosure2.51 MWnot published
Published durations2 h2 h
Segmentutility-scaleutility-scale
Statusshippingshipping
Cell chemistryLFPLFP
Cell capacity314 Ah587 Ah
Cell configuration12P416S416S8P
Cell suppliernot publishednot published
Form factor20 ft container20 ft container
Block typeDC blockDC block
PCS integratednono
DC voltage1164.8–1497.6 V1081.6–1497.6 V
Coolingliquid-cooledliquid-cooled
Ingress protectionIP55IP55
Operating temperature-30…60 °C-30…55 (>45 derating) °C
Dimensions (L × W × H)6200 × 2550 × 2896 mm6058 × 2438 × 2896 mm
Weight43 t48 t
Energy densitynot publishednot published
Round-trip efficiencynot publishednot published
Cycle lifenot publishednot published
Calendar lifenot publishednot published
Warrantynot publishednot published
Fire suppressionnot publishedaerosol-based suppression; flooded fire protection option; pack-level fire protection
GenerationMB31 (314 Ah)not published
Announcednot publishednot published
CertificationsUN3536IEC 61000, IEC 62477-1, IEC 62619, IEC 62933-5-2, IEC 63056, UL 9540A, UN 3536, UN 38.3
Public datasheetyesyes

Where they differ

Only fields both manufacturers publish and where the values are not identical. Not a judgement — the right choice depends on the project.

  • Max energy per enclosure: Liquid Cooling BESS Container BP-52-166.4/314-L — 5.016 MWh; Z BOX-P 6200 2H — 6.25 MWh
  • Cell capacity: Liquid Cooling BESS Container BP-52-166.4/314-L — 314 Ah; Z BOX-P 6200 2H — 587 Ah
  • Cell configuration: Liquid Cooling BESS Container BP-52-166.4/314-L — 12P416S; Z BOX-P 6200 2H — 416S8P
  • DC voltage: Liquid Cooling BESS Container BP-52-166.4/314-L — 1164.8–1497.6 V; Z BOX-P 6200 2H — 1081.6–1497.6 V
  • Operating temperature: Liquid Cooling BESS Container BP-52-166.4/314-L — -30…60 °C; Z BOX-P 6200 2H — -30…55 (>45 derating) °C
  • Dimensions (L × W × H): Liquid Cooling BESS Container BP-52-166.4/314-L — 6200 × 2550 × 2896 mm; Z BOX-P 6200 2H — 6058 × 2438 × 2896 mm
  • Weight: Liquid Cooling BESS Container BP-52-166.4/314-L — 43 t; Z BOX-P 6200 2H — 48 t
  • Certifications: Liquid Cooling BESS Container BP-52-166.4/314-L — UN3536; Z BOX-P 6200 2H — IEC 61000, IEC 62477-1, IEC 62619, IEC 62933-5-2, IEC 63056, UL 9540A, UN 3536, UN 38.3

Published by only one of the two: Max power per enclosure, Fire suppression, Generation.

Variants

EVE Energy Liquid Cooling BESS Container BP-52-166.4/314-L variants

VariantsEnergyPowerDuration
5016 kWh, 0.5P (2.51 MW per evebatteryusa)5.016 MWh2.51 MW2 h

ZOE Energy Storage Z BOX-P 6200 2H variants

VariantsEnergyPowerDuration
P 6200-2H (6.25 MWh, '2H~8H' long-duration)6.25 MWhnot published2 h

Full model cards

Open EVE Energy Liquid Cooling BESS Container BP-52-166.4/314-L →Open ZOE Energy Storage Z BOX-P 6200 2H →

Other comparisons

Gotion High-Tech Gotion Grid 5 MWh (ESD1331-05P5015) vs ZOE Energy Storage Z BOX-P 6200 2HGotion High-Tech Gotion Grid 5 MWh (ESD1331-05P5015) vs EVE Energy Liquid Cooling BESS Container BP-52-166.4/314-LPylontech Container L5000-BAT vs ZOE Energy Storage Z BOX-P 6200 2HPylontech Container L5000-BAT vs EVE Energy Liquid Cooling BESS Container BP-52-166.4/314-LSunwoda Energy NoahX 2.0 (NoahX-1500/4170, NoahX-1500/5015-L2) vs ZOE Energy Storage Z BOX-P 6200 2HSunwoda Energy NoahX 2.0 (NoahX-1500/4170, NoahX-1500/5015-L2) vs EVE Energy Liquid Cooling BESS Container BP-52-166.4/314-LCATL TENER vs ZOE Energy Storage Z BOX-P 6200 2HCATL TENER vs EVE Energy Liquid Cooling BESS Container BP-52-166.4/314-L