▮▮Coloprice

BESS comparison

CATL TENER vs EVE Energy Liquid Cooling BESS Container BP-52-166.4/314-L

Both columns come from what CATL and EVE Energy publish. Fields either maker does not publish are marked «not published»; we do not estimate or rank.

Specifications side by side

FieldCATL TENEREVE Energy Liquid Cooling BESS Container BP-52-166.4/314-L
Max energy per enclosure6.25 MWh5.016 MWh
Max power per enclosure3.126 MW2.51 MW
Published durations2 h2 h
Segmentutility-scaleutility-scale
Statusshippingshipping
Cell chemistryLFPLFP
Cell capacity587 Ah314 Ah
Cell configuration1P104S×4×8P (pack 1P104S, 4 packs per rack = 1P416S, 8 racks in parallel)12P416S
Cell suppliernot publishednot published
Form factor20 ft container20 ft container
Block typeDC blockDC block
PCS integratednono
DC voltage1331.2 rated; 1040–1500 range V1164.8–1497.6 V
Coolingliquid-cooledliquid-cooled
Ingress protectionnot publishedIP55
Operating temperature-30…55 °C-30…60 °C
Dimensions (L × W × H)not published6200 × 2550 × 2896 mm
Weight45 t43 t
Energy densitynot publishednot published
Round-trip efficiencynot publishednot published
Cycle life8,000 · Cell-level figure from CATL 2026 brochure: 587 Ah cell ≥8,000 cycles (25 °C, 0.5P/0.5P, 70% SOH). System-level cycle life not published; CATL claims zero capacity/power degradation in first five years.not published
Calendar lifenot publishednot published
Warrantynot publishednot published
Fire suppressionnot publishednot published
GenerationTENER (2024); Chinese market designation 天恒 C2-L625MB31 (314 Ah)
Announced2024-04not published
CertificationsGB 44240-2024, GB/T 34131-2023, GB/T 36276-2023, GB/T 44026-2024UN3536
Public datasheetyesyes

Where they differ

Only fields both manufacturers publish and where the values are not identical. Not a judgement — the right choice depends on the project.

  • Max energy per enclosure: TENER — 6.25 MWh; Liquid Cooling BESS Container BP-52-166.4/314-L — 5.016 MWh
  • Max power per enclosure: TENER — 3.126 MW; Liquid Cooling BESS Container BP-52-166.4/314-L — 2.51 MW
  • Cell capacity: TENER — 587 Ah; Liquid Cooling BESS Container BP-52-166.4/314-L — 314 Ah
  • Cell configuration: TENER — 1P104S×4×8P (pack 1P104S, 4 packs per rack = 1P416S, 8 racks in parallel); Liquid Cooling BESS Container BP-52-166.4/314-L — 12P416S
  • DC voltage: TENER — 1331.2 rated; 1040–1500 range V; Liquid Cooling BESS Container BP-52-166.4/314-L — 1164.8–1497.6 V
  • Operating temperature: TENER — -30…55 °C; Liquid Cooling BESS Container BP-52-166.4/314-L — -30…60 °C
  • Weight: TENER — 45 t; Liquid Cooling BESS Container BP-52-166.4/314-L — 43 t
  • Generation: TENER — TENER (2024); Chinese market designation 天恒 C2-L625; Liquid Cooling BESS Container BP-52-166.4/314-L — MB31 (314 Ah)
  • Certifications: TENER — GB 44240-2024, GB/T 34131-2023, GB/T 36276-2023, GB/T 44026-2024; Liquid Cooling BESS Container BP-52-166.4/314-L — UN3536

Published by only one of the two: Ingress protection, Dimensions (L × W × H), Cycle life, Announced.

Variants

CATL TENER variants

VariantsEnergyPowerDuration
6.25 MWh 0.5P (2 × 1562.82 kW); brochure states 2 h/4 h system compatibility6.25 MWh3.126 MW2 h

EVE Energy Liquid Cooling BESS Container BP-52-166.4/314-L variants

VariantsEnergyPowerDuration
5016 kWh, 0.5P (2.51 MW per evebatteryusa)5.016 MWh2.51 MW2 h

Full model cards

Open CATL TENER →Open EVE Energy Liquid Cooling BESS Container BP-52-166.4/314-L →

Other comparisons

Gotion High-Tech Gotion Grid 5 MWh (ESD1331-05P5015) vs CATL TENERGotion High-Tech Gotion Grid 5 MWh (ESD1331-05P5015) vs EVE Energy Liquid Cooling BESS Container BP-52-166.4/314-LPylontech Container L5000-BAT vs CATL TENERPylontech Container L5000-BAT vs EVE Energy Liquid Cooling BESS Container BP-52-166.4/314-LSunwoda Energy NoahX 2.0 (NoahX-1500/4170, NoahX-1500/5015-L2) vs CATL TENERSunwoda Energy NoahX 2.0 (NoahX-1500/4170, NoahX-1500/5015-L2) vs EVE Energy Liquid Cooling BESS Container BP-52-166.4/314-LCATL TENER vs Great Power Max-20HC-5000CATL TENER vs HiTHIUM ∞Power 6.25MWh