▮▮Coloprice

Market comparison

Calgary, Canada vs Vancouver, Canada

Both columns are built from the catalog and the price index: Calgary — 10 facilities from 6 operators, Vancouver — 10 facilities from 4 operators. Where a benchmark or a tariff is not published, the cell says so.

Markets side by side

FieldCalgaryVancouver
Tracked facilities1010
Operators64
Published IT capacity13 MW (3 of 10 sites publish)5 MW (2 of 10 sites publish)
Operational108
Under construction / announced02
Tier III+ certified sites00
Sites with any certification32
Liquid-cooled sites02
AI-ready sites02
Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/monthnot publishednot published
Benchmark change, yoynot publishednot published
Industrial power tariff, $/kWh$0.115$0.115
Average Coloprice Score18/100 across 10 sites14/100 across 10 sites
Latency between the twonot published

Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-10-01; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.

Where they differ

Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.

  • Operators: Calgary — 6; Vancouver — 4
  • Published IT capacity: Calgary — 13 MW (3 of 10 sites publish); Vancouver — 5 MW (2 of 10 sites publish)
  • Operational: Calgary — 10; Vancouver — 8
  • Under construction / announced: Calgary — 0; Vancouver — 2
  • Sites with any certification: Calgary — 3; Vancouver — 2
  • Liquid-cooled sites: Calgary — 0; Vancouver — 2
  • AI-ready sites: Calgary — 0; Vancouver — 2
  • Average Coloprice Score: Calgary — 18/100 across 10 sites; Vancouver — 14/100 across 10 sites

Top facilities by score

Calgary, Canada

Vancouver, Canada

Open Calgary data centers →Open Vancouver data centers →Colocation pricing in Calgary →Colocation pricing in Vancouver →

Other comparisons

Calgary vs TorontoCalgary vs MontrealToronto vs VancouverMontreal vs Vancouver