▮▮Coloprice

Market comparison

Calgary, Canada vs Montreal, Canada

Both columns are built from the catalog and the price index: Calgary — 10 facilities from 6 operators, Montreal — 23 facilities from 10 operators. Where a benchmark or a tariff is not published, the cell says so.

Markets side by side

FieldCalgaryMontreal
Tracked facilities1023
Operators610
Published IT capacity13 MW (3 of 10 sites publish)126 MW (5 of 23 sites publish)
Operational1023
Under construction / announced00
Tier III+ certified sites02
Sites with any certification35
Liquid-cooled sites00
AI-ready sites01
Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/monthnot publishednot published
Benchmark change, yoynot publishednot published
Industrial power tariff, $/kWh$0.115$0.115
Average Coloprice Score18/100 across 10 sites16/100 across 23 sites
Latency between the twonot published

Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-10-01; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.

Where they differ

Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.

  • Tracked facilities: Calgary — 10; Montreal — 23
  • Operators: Calgary — 6; Montreal — 10
  • Published IT capacity: Calgary — 13 MW (3 of 10 sites publish); Montreal — 126 MW (5 of 23 sites publish)
  • Operational: Calgary — 10; Montreal — 23
  • Tier III+ certified sites: Calgary — 0; Montreal — 2
  • Sites with any certification: Calgary — 3; Montreal — 5
  • AI-ready sites: Calgary — 0; Montreal — 1
  • Average Coloprice Score: Calgary — 18/100 across 10 sites; Montreal — 16/100 across 23 sites

Top facilities by score

Calgary, Canada

Montreal, Canada

Open Calgary data centers →Open Montreal data centers →Colocation pricing in Calgary →Colocation pricing in Montreal →

Other comparisons

Calgary vs TorontoCalgary vs VancouverMontreal vs TorontoMontreal vs Vancouver