▮▮Coloprice

Market comparison

Calgary, Canada vs Toronto, Canada

Both columns are built from the catalog and the price index: Calgary — 10 facilities from 6 operators, Toronto — 30 facilities from 17 operators. Where a benchmark or a tariff is not published, the cell says so.

Markets side by side

FieldCalgaryToronto
Tracked facilities1030
Operators617
Published IT capacity13 MW (3 of 10 sites publish)190 MW (10 of 30 sites publish)
Operational1029
Under construction / announced01
Tier III+ certified sites00
Sites with any certification310
Liquid-cooled sites00
AI-ready sites02
Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/monthnot publishednot published
Benchmark change, yoynot publishednot published
Industrial power tariff, $/kWh$0.115$0.115
Average Coloprice Score18/100 across 10 sites20/100 across 30 sites
Latency between the twonot published

Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-10-01; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.

Where they differ

Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.

  • Tracked facilities: Calgary — 10; Toronto — 30
  • Operators: Calgary — 6; Toronto — 17
  • Published IT capacity: Calgary — 13 MW (3 of 10 sites publish); Toronto — 190 MW (10 of 30 sites publish)
  • Operational: Calgary — 10; Toronto — 29
  • Under construction / announced: Calgary — 0; Toronto — 1
  • Sites with any certification: Calgary — 3; Toronto — 10
  • AI-ready sites: Calgary — 0; Toronto — 2
  • Average Coloprice Score: Calgary — 18/100 across 10 sites; Toronto — 20/100 across 30 sites

Top facilities by score

Calgary, Canada

Toronto, Canada

Open Calgary data centers →Open Toronto data centers →Colocation pricing in Calgary →Colocation pricing in Toronto →

Other comparisons

Calgary vs MontrealCalgary vs VancouverMontreal vs TorontoToronto vs VancouverToronto vs Ashburn