▮▮Coloprice

Market comparison

Huechuraba, Chile vs Lampa, Chile

Both columns are built from the catalog and the price index: Huechuraba — 3 facilities from 3 operators, Lampa — 3 facilities from 2 operators. Where a benchmark or a tariff is not published, the cell says so.

Markets side by side

FieldHuechurabaLampa
Tracked facilities33
Operators32
Published IT capacity9 MW (2 of 3 sites publish)50 MW (2 of 3 sites publish)
Operational21
Under construction / announced12
Tier III+ certified sites10
Sites with any certification11
Liquid-cooled sites00
AI-ready sites00
Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/month$200 (country-level)$200 (country-level)
Benchmark change, yoy0%0%
Industrial power tariff, $/kWh$0.212$0.212
Average Coloprice Score24/100 across 3 sites18/100 across 3 sites
Latency between the twonot published

Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-10-01; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.

Where they differ

Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.

  • Operators: Huechuraba — 3; Lampa — 2
  • Published IT capacity: Huechuraba — 9 MW (2 of 3 sites publish); Lampa — 50 MW (2 of 3 sites publish)
  • Operational: Huechuraba — 2; Lampa — 1
  • Under construction / announced: Huechuraba — 1; Lampa — 2
  • Tier III+ certified sites: Huechuraba — 1; Lampa — 0
  • Average Coloprice Score: Huechuraba — 24/100 across 3 sites; Lampa — 18/100 across 3 sites

Top facilities by score

Huechuraba, Chile

Lampa, Chile

Open Huechuraba data centers →Open Lampa data centers →Colocation pricing in Huechuraba →Colocation pricing in Lampa →

Other comparisons

Huechuraba vs SantiagoHuechuraba vs ValparaísoLampa vs SantiagoLampa vs Valparaíso