▮▮Coloprice

Market comparison

Lampa, Chile vs Santiago, Chile

Both columns are built from the catalog and the price index: Lampa — 3 facilities from 2 operators, Santiago — 25 facilities from 11 operators. Where a benchmark or a tariff is not published, the cell says so.

Markets side by side

FieldLampaSantiago
Tracked facilities325
Operators211
Published IT capacity50 MW (2 of 3 sites publish)85 MW (8 of 25 sites publish)
Operational125
Under construction / announced20
Tier III+ certified sites014
Sites with any certification117
Liquid-cooled sites00
AI-ready sites00
Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/month$200 (country-level)$200 (country-level)
Benchmark change, yoy0%0%
Industrial power tariff, $/kWh$0.212$0.212
Average Coloprice Score18/100 across 3 sites31/100 across 25 sites
Latency between the twonot published

Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-09-26; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.

Where they differ

Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.

  • Tracked facilities: Lampa — 3; Santiago — 25
  • Operators: Lampa — 2; Santiago — 11
  • Published IT capacity: Lampa — 50 MW (2 of 3 sites publish); Santiago — 85 MW (8 of 25 sites publish)
  • Operational: Lampa — 1; Santiago — 25
  • Under construction / announced: Lampa — 2; Santiago — 0
  • Tier III+ certified sites: Lampa — 0; Santiago — 14
  • Sites with any certification: Lampa — 1; Santiago — 17
  • Average Coloprice Score: Lampa — 18/100 across 3 sites; Santiago — 31/100 across 25 sites

Top facilities by score

Lampa, Chile

Santiago, Chile

Open Lampa data centers →Open Santiago data centers →Colocation pricing in Lampa →Colocation pricing in Santiago →