▮▮Coloprice

Market comparison

Cairo, Egypt vs Giza, Egypt

Both columns are built from the catalog and the price index: Cairo — 10 facilities from 8 operators, Giza — 6 facilities from 6 operators. Where a benchmark or a tariff is not published, the cell says so.

Markets side by side

FieldCairoGiza
Tracked facilities106
Operators86
Published IT capacity45 MW (2 of 10 sites publish)not published
Operational86
Under construction / announced20
Tier III+ certified sites66
Sites with any certification76
Liquid-cooled sites00
AI-ready sites10
Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/monthnot publishednot published
Benchmark change, yoynot publishednot published
Industrial power tariff, $/kWh$0.038$0.038
Average Coloprice Score22/100 across 10 sites28/100 across 6 sites
Latency between the twonot published

Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-10-01; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.

Where they differ

Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.

  • Tracked facilities: Cairo — 10; Giza — 6
  • Operators: Cairo — 8; Giza — 6
  • Operational: Cairo — 8; Giza — 6
  • Under construction / announced: Cairo — 2; Giza — 0
  • Sites with any certification: Cairo — 7; Giza — 6
  • AI-ready sites: Cairo — 1; Giza — 0
  • Average Coloprice Score: Cairo — 22/100 across 10 sites; Giza — 28/100 across 6 sites

Published for only one side: Published IT capacity.

Top facilities by score

Open Cairo data centers →Open Giza data centers →Colocation pricing in Cairo →Colocation pricing in Giza →