▮▮Coloprice

Market comparison

Espoo, Finland vs Helsinki, Finland

Both columns are built from the catalog and the price index: Espoo — 4 facilities from 2 operators, Helsinki — 6 facilities from 4 operators. Where a benchmark or a tariff is not published, the cell says so.

Markets side by side

FieldEspooHelsinki
Tracked facilities46
Operators24
Published IT capacity10 MW (1 of 4 sites publish)66 MW (3 of 6 sites publish)
Operational46
Under construction / announced00
Tier III+ certified sites00
Sites with any certification45
Liquid-cooled sites01
AI-ready sites02
Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/monthnot publishednot published
Benchmark change, yoynot publishednot published
Industrial power tariff, $/kWh$0.105$0.105
Average Coloprice Score30/100 across 4 sites37/100 across 6 sites
Latency between the twonot published

Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-09-26; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.

Where they differ

Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.

  • Tracked facilities: Espoo — 4; Helsinki — 6
  • Operators: Espoo — 2; Helsinki — 4
  • Published IT capacity: Espoo — 10 MW (1 of 4 sites publish); Helsinki — 66 MW (3 of 6 sites publish)
  • Operational: Espoo — 4; Helsinki — 6
  • Sites with any certification: Espoo — 4; Helsinki — 5
  • Liquid-cooled sites: Espoo — 0; Helsinki — 1
  • AI-ready sites: Espoo — 0; Helsinki — 2
  • Average Coloprice Score: Espoo — 30/100 across 4 sites; Helsinki — 37/100 across 6 sites

Top facilities by score

Espoo, Finland

Helsinki, Finland

Open Espoo data centers →Open Helsinki data centers →Colocation pricing in Espoo →Colocation pricing in Helsinki →