▮▮Coloprice

Market comparison

Espoo, Finland vs Tampere, Finland

Both columns are built from the catalog and the price index: Espoo — 6 facilities from 4 operators, Tampere — 3 facilities from 3 operators. Where a benchmark or a tariff is not published, the cell says so.

Markets side by side

FieldEspooTampere
Tracked facilities63
Operators43
Published IT capacity10 MW (1 of 6 sites publish)not published
Operational63
Under construction / announced00
Tier III+ certified sites00
Sites with any certification40
Liquid-cooled sites00
AI-ready sites00
Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/monthnot publishednot published
Benchmark change, yoynot publishednot published
Industrial power tariff, $/kWh$0.105$0.105
Average Coloprice Score23/100 across 6 sites9/100 across 3 sites
Latency between the twonot published

Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-10-01; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.

Where they differ

Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.

  • Tracked facilities: Espoo — 6; Tampere — 3
  • Operators: Espoo — 4; Tampere — 3
  • Operational: Espoo — 6; Tampere — 3
  • Sites with any certification: Espoo — 4; Tampere — 0
  • Average Coloprice Score: Espoo — 23/100 across 6 sites; Tampere — 9/100 across 3 sites

Published for only one side: Published IT capacity.

Top facilities by score

Espoo, Finland

Tampere, Finland

Open Espoo data centers →Open Tampere data centers →Colocation pricing in Espoo →Colocation pricing in Tampere →

Other comparisons

Espoo vs HelsinkiHelsinki vs Tampere