▮▮Coloprice

Market comparison

Rome, Italy vs Turin, Italy

Both columns are built from the catalog and the price index: Rome — 14 facilities from 13 operators, Turin — 6 facilities from 6 operators. Where a benchmark or a tariff is not published, the cell says so.

Markets side by side

FieldRomeTurin
Tracked facilities146
Operators136
Published IT capacity6 MW (1 of 14 sites publish)not published
Operational146
Under construction / announced00
Tier III+ certified sites42
Sites with any certification62
Liquid-cooled sites00
AI-ready sites00
Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/monthnot publishednot published
Benchmark change, yoynot publishednot published
Industrial power tariff, $/kWh$0.323$0.323
Average Coloprice Score18/100 across 14 sites16/100 across 6 sites
Latency between the twonot published

Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-10-01; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.

Where they differ

Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.

  • Tracked facilities: Rome — 14; Turin — 6
  • Operators: Rome — 13; Turin — 6
  • Operational: Rome — 14; Turin — 6
  • Tier III+ certified sites: Rome — 4; Turin — 2
  • Sites with any certification: Rome — 6; Turin — 2
  • Average Coloprice Score: Rome — 18/100 across 14 sites; Turin — 16/100 across 6 sites

Published for only one side: Published IT capacity.

Top facilities by score

Rome, Italy

Turin, Italy

Open Rome data centers →Open Turin data centers →Colocation pricing in Rome →Colocation pricing in Turin →

Other comparisons

Milan vs RomeRome vs Milan (Castelletto)Milan vs TurinMilan (Castelletto) vs Turin