▮▮Coloprice

Market comparison

Milan, Italy vs Rome, Italy

Both columns are built from the catalog and the price index: Milan — 29 facilities from 13 operators, Rome — 4 facilities from 4 operators. Where a benchmark or a tariff is not published, the cell says so.

Markets side by side

FieldMilanRome
Tracked facilities294
Operators134
Published IT capacity604 MW (19 of 29 sites publish)6 MW (1 of 4 sites publish)
Operational254
Under construction / announced40
Tier III+ certified sites63
Sites with any certification124
Liquid-cooled sites10
AI-ready sites00
Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/monthnot publishednot published
Benchmark change, yoynot publishednot published
Industrial power tariff, $/kWh$0.323$0.323
Average Coloprice Score29/100 across 29 sites31/100 across 4 sites
Latency between the twonot published

Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-09-26; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.

Where they differ

Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.

  • Tracked facilities: Milan — 29; Rome — 4
  • Operators: Milan — 13; Rome — 4
  • Published IT capacity: Milan — 604 MW (19 of 29 sites publish); Rome — 6 MW (1 of 4 sites publish)
  • Operational: Milan — 25; Rome — 4
  • Under construction / announced: Milan — 4; Rome — 0
  • Tier III+ certified sites: Milan — 6; Rome — 3
  • Sites with any certification: Milan — 12; Rome — 4
  • Liquid-cooled sites: Milan — 1; Rome — 0
  • Average Coloprice Score: Milan — 29/100 across 29 sites; Rome — 31/100 across 4 sites

Top facilities by score

Milan, Italy

Rome, Italy

Open Milan data centers →Open Rome data centers →Colocation pricing in Milan →Colocation pricing in Rome →

Other comparisons

Milan vs Milan (Castelletto)Rome vs Milan (Castelletto)