▮▮Coloprice

Market comparison

Milan, Italy vs Rome, Italy

Both columns are built from the catalog and the price index: Milan — 35 facilities from 18 operators, Rome — 14 facilities from 12 operators. Where a benchmark or a tariff is not published, the cell says so.

Markets side by side

FieldMilanRome
Tracked facilities3514
Operators1812
Published IT capacity604 MW (19 of 35 sites publish)6 MW (1 of 14 sites publish)
Operational3114
Under construction / announced40
Tier III+ certified sites64
Sites with any certification126
Liquid-cooled sites10
AI-ready sites00
Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/monthnot publishednot published
Benchmark change, yoynot publishednot published
Industrial power tariff, $/kWh$0.323$0.323
Average Coloprice Score26/100 across 35 sites18/100 across 14 sites
Latency between the twonot published

Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-10-01; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.

Where they differ

Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.

  • Tracked facilities: Milan — 35; Rome — 14
  • Operators: Milan — 18; Rome — 12
  • Published IT capacity: Milan — 604 MW (19 of 35 sites publish); Rome — 6 MW (1 of 14 sites publish)
  • Operational: Milan — 31; Rome — 14
  • Under construction / announced: Milan — 4; Rome — 0
  • Tier III+ certified sites: Milan — 6; Rome — 4
  • Sites with any certification: Milan — 12; Rome — 6
  • Liquid-cooled sites: Milan — 1; Rome — 0
  • Average Coloprice Score: Milan — 26/100 across 35 sites; Rome — 18/100 across 14 sites

Top facilities by score

Milan, Italy

Rome, Italy

Open Milan data centers →Open Rome data centers →Colocation pricing in Milan →Colocation pricing in Rome →

Other comparisons

Milan vs Milan (Castelletto)Milan vs TurinRome vs Milan (Castelletto)Rome vs Turin