▮▮Coloprice

Market comparison

Amman, Jordan vs Aqaba, Jordan

Both columns are built from the catalog and the price index: Amman — 10 facilities from 8 operators, Aqaba — 4 facilities from 2 operators. Where a benchmark or a tariff is not published, the cell says so.

Markets side by side

FieldAmmanAqaba
Tracked facilities104
Operators82
Published IT capacitynot published6 MW (1 of 4 sites publish)
Operational94
Under construction / announced10
Tier III+ certified sites104
Sites with any certification104
Liquid-cooled sites00
AI-ready sites01
Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/monthnot publishednot published
Benchmark change, yoynot publishednot published
Industrial power tariff, $/kWh$0.169$0.169
Average Coloprice Score32/100 across 10 sites37/100 across 4 sites
Latency between the twonot published

Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-10-01; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.

Where they differ

Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.

  • Tracked facilities: Amman — 10; Aqaba — 4
  • Operators: Amman — 8; Aqaba — 2
  • Operational: Amman — 9; Aqaba — 4
  • Under construction / announced: Amman — 1; Aqaba — 0
  • Tier III+ certified sites: Amman — 10; Aqaba — 4
  • Sites with any certification: Amman — 10; Aqaba — 4
  • AI-ready sites: Amman — 0; Aqaba — 1
  • Average Coloprice Score: Amman — 32/100 across 10 sites; Aqaba — 37/100 across 4 sites

Published for only one side: Published IT capacity.

Top facilities by score

Aqaba, Jordan

Open Amman data centers →Open Aqaba data centers →Colocation pricing in Amman →Colocation pricing in Aqaba →