▮▮Coloprice

Market comparison

Islamabad, Pakistan vs Karachi, Pakistan

Both columns are built from the catalog and the price index: Islamabad — 6 facilities from 6 operators, Karachi — 10 facilities from 7 operators. Where a benchmark or a tariff is not published, the cell says so.

Markets side by side

FieldIslamabadKarachi
Tracked facilities610
Operators67
Published IT capacitynot publishednot published
Operational610
Under construction / announced00
Tier III+ certified sites35
Sites with any certification59
Liquid-cooled sites00
AI-ready sites00
Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/monthnot publishednot published
Benchmark change, yoynot publishednot published
Industrial power tariff, $/kWh$0.148$0.148
Average Coloprice Score20/100 across 6 sites19/100 across 10 sites
Latency between the twonot published

Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-10-01; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.

Where they differ

Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.

  • Tracked facilities: Islamabad — 6; Karachi — 10
  • Operators: Islamabad — 6; Karachi — 7
  • Operational: Islamabad — 6; Karachi — 10
  • Tier III+ certified sites: Islamabad — 3; Karachi — 5
  • Sites with any certification: Islamabad — 5; Karachi — 9
  • Average Coloprice Score: Islamabad — 20/100 across 6 sites; Karachi — 19/100 across 10 sites

Top facilities by score

Karachi, Pakistan

Open Islamabad data centers →Open Karachi data centers →Colocation pricing in Islamabad →Colocation pricing in Karachi →

Other comparisons

Islamabad vs LahoreKarachi vs Lahore