▮▮Coloprice

Market comparison

Islamabad, Pakistan vs Lahore, Pakistan

Both columns are built from the catalog and the price index: Islamabad — 6 facilities from 6 operators, Lahore — 6 facilities from 4 operators. Where a benchmark or a tariff is not published, the cell says so.

Markets side by side

FieldIslamabadLahore
Tracked facilities66
Operators64
Published IT capacitynot publishednot published
Operational66
Under construction / announced00
Tier III+ certified sites32
Sites with any certification54
Liquid-cooled sites00
AI-ready sites00
Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/monthnot publishednot published
Benchmark change, yoynot publishednot published
Industrial power tariff, $/kWh$0.148$0.148
Average Coloprice Score20/100 across 6 sites15/100 across 6 sites
Latency between the twonot published

Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-10-01; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.

Where they differ

Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.

  • Operators: Islamabad — 6; Lahore — 4
  • Tier III+ certified sites: Islamabad — 3; Lahore — 2
  • Sites with any certification: Islamabad — 5; Lahore — 4
  • Average Coloprice Score: Islamabad — 20/100 across 6 sites; Lahore — 15/100 across 6 sites

Top facilities by score

Lahore, Pakistan

Open Islamabad data centers →Open Lahore data centers →Colocation pricing in Islamabad →Colocation pricing in Lahore →

Other comparisons

Islamabad vs KarachiKarachi vs Lahore