▮▮Coloprice

Market comparison

Islamabad, Pakistan vs Lahore, Pakistan

Both columns are built from the catalog and the price index: Islamabad — 3 facilities from 3 operators, Lahore — 3 facilities from 1 operators. Where a benchmark or a tariff is not published, the cell says so.

Markets side by side

FieldIslamabadLahore
Tracked facilities33
Operators31
Published IT capacitynot publishednot published
Operational33
Under construction / announced00
Tier III+ certified sites11
Sites with any certification33
Liquid-cooled sites00
AI-ready sites00
Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/monthnot publishednot published
Benchmark change, yoynot publishednot published
Industrial power tariff, $/kWh$0.148$0.148
Average Coloprice Score15/100 across 3 sites14/100 across 3 sites
Latency between the twonot published

Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-09-26; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.

Where they differ

Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.

  • Operators: Islamabad — 3; Lahore — 1
  • Average Coloprice Score: Islamabad — 15/100 across 3 sites; Lahore — 14/100 across 3 sites

Top facilities by score

Islamabad, Pakistan

Lahore, Pakistan

Open Islamabad data centers →Open Lahore data centers →Colocation pricing in Islamabad →Colocation pricing in Lahore →

Other comparisons

Islamabad vs KarachiKarachi vs Lahore