▮▮Coloprice

Market comparison

Karachi, Pakistan vs Lahore, Pakistan

Both columns are built from the catalog and the price index: Karachi — 10 facilities from 7 operators, Lahore — 6 facilities from 4 operators. Where a benchmark or a tariff is not published, the cell says so.

Markets side by side

FieldKarachiLahore
Tracked facilities106
Operators74
Published IT capacitynot publishednot published
Operational106
Under construction / announced00
Tier III+ certified sites52
Sites with any certification94
Liquid-cooled sites00
AI-ready sites00
Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/monthnot publishednot published
Benchmark change, yoynot publishednot published
Industrial power tariff, $/kWh$0.148$0.148
Average Coloprice Score19/100 across 10 sites15/100 across 6 sites
Latency between the twonot published

Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-10-01; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.

Where they differ

Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.

  • Tracked facilities: Karachi — 10; Lahore — 6
  • Operators: Karachi — 7; Lahore — 4
  • Operational: Karachi — 10; Lahore — 6
  • Tier III+ certified sites: Karachi — 5; Lahore — 2
  • Sites with any certification: Karachi — 9; Lahore — 4
  • Average Coloprice Score: Karachi — 19/100 across 10 sites; Lahore — 15/100 across 6 sites

Top facilities by score

Karachi, Pakistan

Lahore, Pakistan

Open Karachi data centers →Open Lahore data centers →Colocation pricing in Karachi →Colocation pricing in Lahore →

Other comparisons

Islamabad vs KarachiIslamabad vs Lahore