▮▮Coloprice

Market comparison

Bucharest, Romania vs Cluj-Napoca, Romania

Both columns are built from the catalog and the price index: Bucharest — 14 facilities from 12 operators, Cluj-Napoca — 4 facilities from 3 operators. Where a benchmark or a tariff is not published, the cell says so.

Markets side by side

FieldBucharestCluj-Napoca
Tracked facilities144
Operators123
Published IT capacity2 MW (1 of 14 sites publish)not published
Operational144
Under construction / announced00
Tier III+ certified sites01
Sites with any certification12
Liquid-cooled sites00
AI-ready sites00
Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/monthnot publishednot published
Benchmark change, yoynot publishednot published
Industrial power tariff, $/kWh$0.285$0.285
Average Coloprice Score11/100 across 14 sites15/100 across 4 sites
Latency between the twonot published

Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-10-01; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.

Where they differ

Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.

  • Tracked facilities: Bucharest — 14; Cluj-Napoca — 4
  • Operators: Bucharest — 12; Cluj-Napoca — 3
  • Operational: Bucharest — 14; Cluj-Napoca — 4
  • Tier III+ certified sites: Bucharest — 0; Cluj-Napoca — 1
  • Sites with any certification: Bucharest — 1; Cluj-Napoca — 2
  • Average Coloprice Score: Bucharest — 11/100 across 14 sites; Cluj-Napoca — 15/100 across 4 sites

Published for only one side: Published IT capacity.

Top facilities by score

Bucharest, Romania

Cluj-Napoca, Romania

Open Bucharest data centers →Open Cluj-Napoca data centers →Colocation pricing in Bucharest →Colocation pricing in Cluj-Napoca →