▮▮Coloprice

Operator comparison

AB Stokab vs Conapto

Both columns come from the facilities each operator publishes and Coloprice tracks: AB Stokab — 4 facilities in 1 countries, Conapto — 4 facilities in 1 countries. Score is the independent Coloprice Score of each facility, averaged; it is never sold.

Portfolios side by side

FieldAB StokabConapto
Tracked facilities44
Countries11
Cities11
Published IT capacitynot published39 MW (4 of 4 sites publish)
Operational44
Under construction / announced00
Liquid-cooled sites01
AI-ready sites01
Most common certificationsnot publishedISO 14001, ISO 50001
Average Coloprice Score9/100 across 4 scored sites28/100 across 4 scored sites
Awards and badgesnot published4
Highest-scored facilitySTOKAB KN5, Södermalm (9/100)Conapto STHLM 4 South (33/100)

Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-10-01; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.

Where they differ

Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.

  • Liquid-cooled sites: AB Stokab — 0; Conapto — 1
  • AI-ready sites: AB Stokab — 0; Conapto — 1
  • Average Coloprice Score: AB Stokab — 9/100 across 4 scored sites; Conapto — 28/100 across 4 scored sites
  • Highest-scored facility: AB Stokab — STOKAB KN5, Södermalm (9/100); Conapto — Conapto STHLM 4 South (33/100)

Published for only one side: Published IT capacity, Most common certifications, Awards and badges.

Highest-scored facility

Open AB Stokab profile →Open Conapto profile →

Other comparisons

AB Stokab vs Digital Realty (Interxion)AB Stokab vs BahnhofConapto vs Digital Realty (Interxion)Bahnhof vs Conapto