Operator comparison
CDC Data Centres vs Macquarie Data Centres
Both columns come from the facilities each operator publishes and Coloprice tracks: CDC Data Centres — 13 facilities in 2 countries, Macquarie Data Centres — 6 facilities in 1 countries. Score is the independent Coloprice Score of each facility, averaged; it is never sold.
CDC Data Centres
13
Tracked facilities · Countries: 2
Where they operate: Australia, New Zealand
Macquarie Data Centres
6
Tracked facilities · Countries: 1
Where they operate: Australia
Portfolios side by side
| Field | CDC Data Centres | Macquarie Data Centres |
|---|---|---|
| Tracked facilities | 13 | 6 |
| Countries | 2 | 1 |
| Cities | 6 | 2 |
| Published IT capacity | 3,308 MW (13 of 13 sites publish) | 67 MW (4 of 6 sites publish) |
| Operational | 8 | 5 |
| Under construction / announced | 5 | 1 |
| Liquid-cooled sites | 2 | 1 |
| AI-ready sites | 13 | 1 |
| Most common certifications | Toitū net carbonzero certified, Australian Government Certified Strategic | DISP, IRAP Assessed, ISO 14001, ISO 27001 |
| Average Coloprice Score | 24/100 across 13 scored sites | 38/100 across 6 scored sites |
| Awards and badges | 2 | 8 |
| Highest-scored facility | CDC Brooklyn Campus (29/100) | Macquarie IC3 East Macquarie Park (47/100) |
Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-09-26; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.
Where they differ
Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.
- Tracked facilities: CDC Data Centres — 13; Macquarie Data Centres — 6
- Countries: CDC Data Centres — 2; Macquarie Data Centres — 1
- Cities: CDC Data Centres — 6; Macquarie Data Centres — 2
- Published IT capacity: CDC Data Centres — 3,308 MW (13 of 13 sites publish); Macquarie Data Centres — 67 MW (4 of 6 sites publish)
- Operational: CDC Data Centres — 8; Macquarie Data Centres — 5
- Under construction / announced: CDC Data Centres — 5; Macquarie Data Centres — 1
- Liquid-cooled sites: CDC Data Centres — 2; Macquarie Data Centres — 1
- AI-ready sites: CDC Data Centres — 13; Macquarie Data Centres — 1
- Most common certifications: CDC Data Centres — Toitū net carbonzero certified, Australian Government Certified Strategic; Macquarie Data Centres — DISP, IRAP Assessed, ISO 14001, ISO 27001
- Average Coloprice Score: CDC Data Centres — 24/100 across 13 scored sites; Macquarie Data Centres — 38/100 across 6 scored sites
- Awards and badges: CDC Data Centres — 2; Macquarie Data Centres — 8
- Highest-scored facility: CDC Data Centres — CDC Brooklyn Campus (29/100); Macquarie Data Centres — Macquarie IC3 East Macquarie Park (47/100)
Highest-scored facility
CDC Data Centres
CDC Brooklyn Campus
Melbourne (Brooklyn), Australia · 350 MW · 29/100
Macquarie Data Centres
Macquarie IC3 East Macquarie Park
Sydney (Macquarie Park), Australia · 12 MW · 47/100
Open CDC Data Centres profile →Open Macquarie Data Centres profile →
Other comparisons
CDC Data Centres vs NEXTDCCDC Data Centres vs EquinixCDC Data Centres vs TenPeaks Data CentresCDC Data Centres vs Datacom GroupMacquarie Data Centres vs NEXTDCEquinix vs Macquarie Data Centres