Operator comparison
CDC Data Centres vs Datacom Group
Both columns come from the facilities each operator publishes and Coloprice tracks: CDC Data Centres — 19 facilities in 2 countries, Datacom Group — 9 facilities in 2 countries. Score is the independent Coloprice Score of each facility, averaged; it is never sold.
CDC Data Centres
19
Tracked facilities · Countries: 2
Where they operate: Australia, New Zealand
Datacom Group
9
Tracked facilities · Countries: 2
Where they operate: Australia, New Zealand
Portfolios side by side
| Field | CDC Data Centres | Datacom Group |
|---|---|---|
| Tracked facilities | 19 | 9 |
| Countries | 2 | 2 |
| Cities | 6 | 6 |
| Published IT capacity | 3,308 MW (13 of 19 sites publish) | 37 MW (5 of 9 sites publish) |
| Operational | 14 | 9 |
| Under construction / announced | 5 | 0 |
| Liquid-cooled sites | 2 | 0 |
| AI-ready sites | 13 | 0 |
| Most common certifications | Toitū net carbonzero certified, Australian Government Certified Strategic | ISAE 3000, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, Uptime Institute M&O Stamp of Approval |
| Average Coloprice Score | 19/100 across 19 scored sites | 19/100 across 9 scored sites |
| Awards and badges | 9 | 10 |
| Highest-scored facility | CDC Brooklyn Campus (29/100) | Datacom Kapua Data Centre (38/100) |
Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-10-01; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.
Where they differ
Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.
- Tracked facilities: CDC Data Centres — 19; Datacom Group — 9
- Published IT capacity: CDC Data Centres — 3,308 MW (13 of 19 sites publish); Datacom Group — 37 MW (5 of 9 sites publish)
- Operational: CDC Data Centres — 14; Datacom Group — 9
- Under construction / announced: CDC Data Centres — 5; Datacom Group — 0
- Liquid-cooled sites: CDC Data Centres — 2; Datacom Group — 0
- AI-ready sites: CDC Data Centres — 13; Datacom Group — 0
- Most common certifications: CDC Data Centres — Toitū net carbonzero certified, Australian Government Certified Strategic; Datacom Group — ISAE 3000, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, Uptime Institute M&O Stamp of Approval
- Average Coloprice Score: CDC Data Centres — 19/100 across 19 scored sites; Datacom Group — 19/100 across 9 scored sites
- Awards and badges: CDC Data Centres — 9; Datacom Group — 10
- Highest-scored facility: CDC Data Centres — CDC Brooklyn Campus (29/100); Datacom Group — Datacom Kapua Data Centre (38/100)
Highest-scored facility
CDC Data Centres
CDC Brooklyn Campus
Melbourne (Brooklyn), Australia · 350 MW · 29/100
Datacom Group
Datacom Kapua Data Centre
Hamilton, New Zealand · 14 MW · 38/100
Open CDC Data Centres profile →Open Datacom Group profile →
Other comparisons
CDC Data Centres vs NEXTDCCDC Data Centres vs EquinixCDC Data Centres vs VocusCDC Data Centres vs SparkCDC Data Centres vs TenPeaks Data CentresDatacom Group vs SparkDatacom Group vs TenPeaks Data Centres