Operator comparison
CDC Data Centres vs Datacom Group
Both columns come from the facilities each operator publishes and Coloprice tracks: CDC Data Centres — 13 facilities in 2 countries, Datacom Group — 4 facilities in 1 countries. Score is the independent Coloprice Score of each facility, averaged; it is never sold.
CDC Data Centres
13
Tracked facilities · Countries: 2
Where they operate: Australia, New Zealand
Datacom Group
4
Tracked facilities · Countries: 1
Where they operate: New Zealand
Portfolios side by side
| Field | CDC Data Centres | Datacom Group |
|---|---|---|
| Tracked facilities | 13 | 4 |
| Countries | 2 | 1 |
| Cities | 6 | 4 |
| Published IT capacity | 3,308 MW (13 of 13 sites publish) | 27 MW (4 of 4 sites publish) |
| Operational | 8 | 4 |
| Under construction / announced | 5 | 0 |
| Liquid-cooled sites | 2 | 0 |
| AI-ready sites | 13 | 0 |
| Most common certifications | Toitū net carbonzero certified, Australian Government Certified Strategic | ISAE 3000, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, Uptime Institute M&O Stamp of Approval |
| Average Coloprice Score | 24/100 across 13 scored sites | 30/100 across 4 scored sites |
| Awards and badges | 2 | 4 |
| Highest-scored facility | CDC Brooklyn Campus (29/100) | Datacom Kapua Data Centre (38/100) |
Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-09-26; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.
Where they differ
Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.
- Tracked facilities: CDC Data Centres — 13; Datacom Group — 4
- Countries: CDC Data Centres — 2; Datacom Group — 1
- Cities: CDC Data Centres — 6; Datacom Group — 4
- Published IT capacity: CDC Data Centres — 3,308 MW (13 of 13 sites publish); Datacom Group — 27 MW (4 of 4 sites publish)
- Operational: CDC Data Centres — 8; Datacom Group — 4
- Under construction / announced: CDC Data Centres — 5; Datacom Group — 0
- Liquid-cooled sites: CDC Data Centres — 2; Datacom Group — 0
- AI-ready sites: CDC Data Centres — 13; Datacom Group — 0
- Most common certifications: CDC Data Centres — Toitū net carbonzero certified, Australian Government Certified Strategic; Datacom Group — ISAE 3000, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, Uptime Institute M&O Stamp of Approval
- Average Coloprice Score: CDC Data Centres — 24/100 across 13 scored sites; Datacom Group — 30/100 across 4 scored sites
- Awards and badges: CDC Data Centres — 2; Datacom Group — 4
- Highest-scored facility: CDC Data Centres — CDC Brooklyn Campus (29/100); Datacom Group — Datacom Kapua Data Centre (38/100)
Highest-scored facility
CDC Data Centres
CDC Brooklyn Campus
Melbourne (Brooklyn), Australia · 350 MW · 29/100
Datacom Group
Datacom Kapua Data Centre
Hamilton, New Zealand · 14 MW · 38/100
Open CDC Data Centres profile →Open Datacom Group profile →
Other comparisons
CDC Data Centres vs NEXTDCCDC Data Centres vs EquinixCDC Data Centres vs Macquarie Data CentresCDC Data Centres vs TenPeaks Data CentresDatacom Group vs TenPeaks Data Centres